Processing math: 100%
文章快速检索     高级检索
  中国水土保持科学   2024, Vol. 22 Issue (6): 10-28, 193-200.  DOI: 10.16843/j.sswc.2024107
0

引用本文 

WANG Chu, NIU Jianzhi, LUN Xiaoxiu, ZHANG Linus, BERNDTSSON Ronny. Review of wastewater treatment technologies, soil and water conservation measures in nuclear power plants, and inspirations to Fukushima accident[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 22(6): 10-28, 193-200. DOI: 10.16843/j.sswc.2024107.
王储, 牛健植, 伦小秀, ZHANGLinus, BERNDTSSONRonny. 核电厂废水处理技术及水土保持措施的综述兼对福岛事故的建议[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2024, 22(6): 10-28, 193-200. DOI: 10.16843/j.sswc.2024107.

Funded

Xiong'an New Area Science and Technology Innovation Project (2022XACX1000)

First author

CHU Wang(2000-)male, master degree candidate. Main research interests: Soil and water conservation. E-mail: 18501017041@163.com

Corresponding author

NIU Jianzhi(1974-)female, doctor of philosophy, professor. Main research interests: Soil and water conservation, soil preferential flow. E-mail: nexk@bjfu.edu.cn
LUN Xiaoxiu(1975-)female, doctor of philosophy, professor. Main research interests: Carbon sequestration, environmental pollution control. E-mail: lunxiaoxiu@bjfu.edu.cn

文章历史

收稿日期:2024-07-28
修回日期:2024-10-07
Review of wastewater treatment technologies, soil and water conservation measures in nuclear power plants, and inspirations to Fukushima accident
WANG Chu1,2, NIU Jianzhi1,3,4,5, LUN Xiaoxiu6, ZHANG Linus7, BERNDTSSON Ronny7     
1. School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China;
2. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, Australia;
3. State Key Laboratory of Efficient Production of Forest Resources, 100083, Beijing, China;
4. Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating, 100083, Beijing, China;
5. Engineering Research Center of Forestry Ecological Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China;
6. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China;
7. Division of Water Resources Engineering & Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Lund University, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden
Abstract: [Background] The previous studies suggest that radioactive elements like Cs and Sr may adversely affect marine ecosystems and the fishing industry. Traditional treatment systems for radioactive wastewater like the Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS) and Kurion have faced challenges in limiting concentration and achieving safety criteria. Studies suggest potential long-term impacts on benthic organisms and seafood networks due to radioactive elements like Cs and Sr from the discharged radioactive wastewater, which may hinder post-disaster recovery and provoke economic losses in the fishing industry both domestically and internationally. A series of studies indicate that there are issues of Cs and Sr pollution migration in soil and water conservation in Fukushima. [Methods] To provide feasible solutions, the main article includes five nuclear wastewater treatment technologies, and soil and water conservation measures for different media (water and soil) were evaluated through reviewing the previous fifteen years' articles. To provide feasible solutions, the main articles, the phytoextraction technologies in Cs and Sr treatment within different land use areas were wildly analyzed (Camellia japonica, Arabidopsis halleri and other local species). [Results] 1) A 99.9% removal rate for Cs+ and 99.5% for Sr2+ was achieved by the KFe[Fe(CN)6] and BaSO4 co-precipitation method. 2) For membrane filtration, Sr2+ and Cs+were removed using metal-organic framework (MOF/graphene oxide) and ion exchange techniques using inorganic materials like titanosilicates. The absorption efficiency of membrane filtration for Sr2+ and Cs+ was at least 92% and 94%, respectively. The study analyzed soil and water conservation technologies in different land uses, river basins and catchments.3) The underground water treatment mainly were completed via the membrance technologies like reverse osmosis and Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRB) technologies. The 90Sr concentration decreased 77%-91% compared to the initial concentration by PRB technology.These diverse methods offered effective strategies for radioactive wastewater treatment, especially the co-precipitation method may be feasible remediation measures to ensure ecological safety surrounding nuclear power utilizing areas. Soil and water conservation measures for soil pollution treatment mainly focused on the use of stabilizers to hinder the migration of Cs and Sr in the soil and the effects of wind erosion such as interpolyelectrolyte complexes. [Conclusions] We evaluated the pollution of Cs and Sr in the Fukushima nuclear radiation soil and water to provide solutions for the treatment of nuclear wastewater and to prevent radionuclide pollutants from migrating into the soil and water.
Keywords: Fukushima nuclear power accident    nuclear wastewater treatment    environmental strategy    soil and water conservation technologies    
核电厂废水处理技术及水土保持措施的综述兼对福岛事故的建议
王储1,2, 牛健植1,3,4,5, 伦小秀6, ZHANGLinus7, BERNDTSSONRonny7     
1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院, 100083, 北京;
2. 悉尼大学生命与环境科学学院, 2006, 悉尼, 澳大利亚;
3. 森林资源高效生产国家重点实验室, 100083, 北京;
4. 国家林业局水土保持与防沙防治重点实验室, 100083, 北京;
5. 北京林业大学教育部林业生态工程工程研究中心, 100083, 北京;
6. 北京林业大学环境科学与工程学院, 100083, 北京;
7. 水资源工程与中东研究中心学部, SE-221 00, 隆德, 瑞典
收稿日期:2024-07-28; 修回日期:2024-10-07
摘要:福岛第一核电站事故导致大量辐射释放到海洋中, 影响了海洋生态系统和渔业并造成经济损失。传统的放射性废水处理系统, 如先进液体处理系统(ALPS系统)和Kurion系统, 在限制浓度和达到安全标准方面面临着挑战。森林和农业用地土壤中检测出过量的锶和铯(Sr和Cs)。笔者通过搜索近20年的主要文献来评估5种水污染处理技术、水土保持措施效果(阻止风蚀与水蚀所产生的污染物迁移)。KFe[Fe(CN)6]与BaSO4共沉淀法对放射性Cs+(99.9%)和Sr2+(99.5%)具有较高的去除率, 在含铯和锶核废水处理中具有应用前景。对于地下水的水土保持措施主要集中在膜技术例如RO膜。在农田林地等不同土地利用中, 植物修复技术被广泛研究例如Arabidopsis halleri。结果表明, 水土保持措施在阻控Cs、Sr土壤与水迁移及风蚀中, 有效方法为稳定剂如聚电解质络合物, 共沉淀法为潜在的储水桶中Sr与Cs污染问题。通过回顾核废水处理和水保措施, 为放射性废水处理提供策略, 为福岛核泄漏事故产生的核废水处理及放射性核素污染物迁移提供解决方案。
关键词福岛核泄漏事故    核废水处理    环境策略    水土保持技术    

Over the previous few decades, nuclear energy has been regarded as a clean and efficient way to provide a stable electricity supply to the major developed countries and it is an indispensable part of the world's energy supply[1]. As shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, current nuclear power plants are mainly distributed in the coastal developed areas and statistics indicate that as of 2022, there were approximately 400 nuclear power plants under operation on a global scale, mainly in countries such as the United States (94), China (80), France (57), Russia (40) and Japan (13), with a total installed capacity exceeding 400 GW[2-3]. Since nuclear energy possesses advantages such as low greenhouse gas emissions, and stable energy supply, there are over 30 nuclear reactors under construction worldwide[4-5]. As displayed in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, USA, France, and Japan represented the main global energy consumers in the world between 2000 and 2011. The number of nuclear reactors reached a peak with nuclear consumption settled at around 2 130.8 TWh between 2013 and 2022[6-7]. Japan's energy consumption was 108-166 TWh between 2018 and 2022. The future of world's nuclear energy consumption is witnessing a transition period to achieve low-carbon and a cleaner development[4]. The core aim of the nuclear power use is to enhance sustainable development requirements[4]. However, there are still important challenges for the nuclear energy application to achieve sustainable development such as management of the radioactive waste, and prevention of nuclear proliferation[1]. Tab. 1 illustrates how past nuclear accidents at the Kyshtym, Chernobyl, and Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plants have caused a negative impact on the surrounding ecological system both immediately and over time[8-22]. They also endanger the environment, food safety, and the mental and physical health of the general populace[8, 23-25]. The Kyshtym nuclear accident was a severe nuclear leaking accident occurred in 1957 near Kishtam, Russia, caused by an explosion of a storage container[26-27]. A significant amount of radioactive material was released, including 137cesium (137Cs), 90strontium, and (90Sr) into the surrounding soil and water system[28]. Previous studies revealed that the total radionuclide content of the soil close to the Chernobyl catastrophy site is still in high level, with 90Sr of 810 TBq and 137Cs of 4 000 TBq, respectively[29]. In Novozybkov district, a highly influenced area by the Chernobyl accident, activity concentration of 90Sr ranged from 70 to 600 Bq/kg in topsoils[30]in 2013, and Petrovi Ac'G2 et al[31] unveiled that the activity concentration of 137Cs in surface soils in Serbia was maximumly 180 Bq/kg, with a mean value of about 30 Bq/kg[31]. An 8-year survey from 2011 to 2019 on crop grain samples collected from Ivankiv district revealed that 90Sr and 137Cs activity concentrations outweighed the Ukrainian standard limitation in 50% of the samples and 90Sr in 75% of the pine tree surpassed the limits on firewood (60 Bq/kg)[32]. A survey from 2011 to 2016 revealed that 137Cs concentration in the milk collected from the Rivne region exceeded the national permissible level of 100 Bq/L and residents suffered from annual intake doses of over 1 mSv/a through the food chain[33]. Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) accident happened in March 2011, mainly caused by the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami (Tab. 1 and Fig. 5). As a result of the Fukushima catastrophe, the liquid that was rich in 11 different types of radionuclides, including 3H, 14C, 137Cs, and 90Sr, was released[34].The accident was a top grade (grade 7) by the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale. Approximately 15-20 PBq of 137Cs or 134Cs and 0.04-1.00 PB q90Sr were FDNPP accident into the North Pacific Ocean[35-36]. The groundwater system also suffered from the radionuclide impact, in which the tritium concentration reached 52.7 Bq/L and 16.5 Bq/L in areas 25 and 50 km away from FDNPP[35-38]. In fact, following the FDNPP accident, Hamada et al[39] found radioactive contamination in various food (such as milk, vegetables, and seafood) and revealed that radionuclides in drinking water in Japan was higher than the levels permitted by the provisional regulations (1-2 000 Bq/kg). Studies[40] revealed that radionuclides originated from anthropogenic sources entered the environment and led a serious risk to humans being by way of the food chain. Other studies[41-43] have pointed out that 90Sr and radioactive Cs concentration also maintained in paddy soil around 300 Bq/kg. A 0.68-0.96 134Cs/137Cs activity ratio was found in all soils, indicating that the radio Cs discharged from the FDNPP was deposited in these regions[43-44].

Fig. 1 Distribution of operational nuclear power plants in the world
Fig. 2 Numbers of nuclear reactors in USA, France, China, Russia, Japan and the UK (in use and under construction) till 2022. Source from Radiation concentration estimates for each tank area
Fig. 3 Nuclear energy consumption of USA, France, Japan, UK, Russia and China during 2000 to 2022
Fig. 4 Nuclear power capacities of USA, France, China, Russia, Japan and the UK (in use and under construction) till 2022
Tab. 1 Concentrations of Cs and Sr in environment near historical nuclear accidents
Fig. 5 Potentially affected areas by the Fukushima accident

Due to its geochemical similarities to calcium, 90Sr it is frequently found in the bones of marine fauna, and studies have showed that 90Sr accumulated in demersal fish (0.17-0.22 Bq/kg) from central and southern sites of the Fukushima coastal regions[45]. Prior to the FDNPP, the 90Sr activity in aquatic creatures (marine fish) in the surrounding areas ranged from 0.025 to 0.021 Bq/kg (fresh weight) and was about 2.0 Bq/kg within 20 km after the FDNPP[46]. The radionuclide bio-accomulation effect threatens the local ecological system and human health.

Radionuclides in wastewater can be migrated and diffused in water systems. Therefore, the treatment of nuclear wastewater is particularly necessary for the environment and ecological system. Current treatment methods of nuclear wastewater include chemical precipitation, physical adsorption, ion exchange, membrane technology, and bioremediation. Chemical precipitation is a fine method of high efficiency by converting radioactive substances into solid waste but with the disadvantage of complexity and subsequent treatment cost of these by-products[47]. Physical adsorption usually has high treatment efficiency for radioactive pollutants, but adsorbents have certain selectivity and saturation capacity[48]. Ion exchange is adsorbed from nuclear wastewater using ion exchange resin and they are desorbed through regeneration, possessing advantage of high removal rate for multiple radioactive nuclides but also the disadvantage of large amount of resin requirement and higher costs[49]. There are still issues in nuclear wastewater treatment and practical treatment strategies to reduce discharge levels. It is, however, difficult to find cost-effective way to treat various radioactive substances. The plan and decision of nuclear wastewater discharging is controversial and complex and requires long-term and sustained multi-party communication to effectively solve the issue. The current disposal strategy applied by the Japanese government may result in high expenses and future potential environmental risks. Sr, Cs, and other radionuclides having nearly 30-year half-lives, are examples of radionuclides that must be stored throughout an extended duration in storage tanks. The nuclear effluent that has been treated still contains reflection nuclides. There are few studies on the financial aspects of these technologies, even though many studies have proposed Sr treatment technologies and the evaluation of their removal efficiency. Some methods are not considered cost-effective solutions. For instance, nanotechnology and membrane technology can treat other radioactive elements like Sr, but their high cost restricts their use.

The region's principal emphasis in soil and water conservation is on the management of 137Cs, a significant pollutant, with less attention given to 90Sr. In marine environments, Cs and Sr may accumulate in coastal sediments, affecting both surface and deep soils. Japan's ocean discharge program also encounters soil contamination issues. Radionuclides, including Sr and Cs, may return to coastal soils due to weather conditions. This can lead to increased soil contamination and erosion, potentially spreading Cs and Sr to neighboring areas. The top few centimeters of soil in Fukushima's forests still contain significant amounts of 137Cs, which could continue to enter waterways[50]. Previous studies have demonstrated the potential for radioactive sediment to re-mobilize in coastal rivers following the 2013 typhoons[51]. These powerful storms caused soil erosion and the remobilization of contaminated material in dam reservoirs or alluvial plains. Soil exposure is influenced by rainfall intensity, potentially polluting downstream watersheds[51]. Rainfall and snowmelt runoff events transport particle-bound radiocesium downstream[52]. Typhoons in the fall exposed the entire watershed's soil to fresh material, with radiation exposures in newly formed sediment layers generally lower than those of adjacent soils[51]. The preferential delivery of particulate matter, which concentrates radioactive contamination in watercourses, reflects the fresh sediment supply from soil to rivers. Thus, it is expected that the degree of contamination in newly formed sediment deposits from recent erosion events is higher than the dose rate in adjacent soils[51]. The application of soil and water conservation techniques can mitigate soil transport, thereby reducing the spread of 137Cs and 90Sr in soils[53]. Within an 80-km radius, 137Cs rapidly moved from the litter layer to the mineral soil surface in forest settings[50]. Soil and water conservation is critical in mitigating the long-term impacts of radioactive contamination. The technologies can prevent pollutants (Cs and Sr) migration in different landuse areas and media.

This paper aims to (ⅰ) analyze the main pollutants and environmental hazards of Fukushima nuclear wastewater discharge, (ⅱ) summarize the current nuclear wastewater treatment technologies for Cs and Sr, and (ⅲ) provide a feasible nuclear wastewater treatment/discharge strategy based on technical, and environmental assessment, (ⅳ) identify potential feasible solutions to address the pollutants (Cs and Sr) in wastewater and the surrounding affected areas of Fukushima accident. The study will provide reliable scientific basis for the treatment of Fukushima nuclear wastewater and emergency response to related nuclear accidents at other sites worldwide, thus, to contribute to the world's nuclear energy industry sustainable development.

1 Methods

A search of the primary literature and the five main recent approaches of treating water pollution and preventing wind and water erosion (migration of pollutants into different media) at the scale of the contaminated area was carried out. This article reviews the main chemical, physical ion exchange and phytoremediation studies and applications in the previous fifteen years, and to compares the advantages and disadvantages of the different research methods, and to find potential ways of treating and preventing the migration of Sr and Cs.

2 Effects of Japan nuclear wastewater discharge 2.1 Fukushima nuclear accident

In some tanks'storage areas, four main elements (including 14C, tritium, Cs, and Sr) exceed the safe range. 3H, 14C, 99Tc, 125Sb, 60Co, 106Ru, 137Cs, 134Cs, 90Sr, and 129I were highly concerned by researchers, governments, and the public because of their high levels of concentration (especially for 90Sr and 137Cs, reaching up to 1575 Bq/L and 2.6Bq/L, respectively)[54-60]. The wastewater is considered a weak β-emitter and the ten main radionuclides were monitored by TEPCO[51-53]. The ocean absorbed about 80% of the radiation emitted into the atmosphere during the March 2011 FDNPP accident[57, 58, 60]. The FDNPP released radioactive fallout into the ocean and over a wide swath of Japan and global[52-55]. During the first several months, a high concentration of radionuclides in seawater and bottom sediments was detected[56]. To cool the nuclear reactor cores to a high temperature and avoid a meltdown, seawater was continuously applied by the TEPCO. The contaminated water was stored in about 1 000 tanks to prevent radionuclide releases and decrease the radionuclide concentration with multiple nuclear wastewater treatment systems containing the Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS) during the first months of the accident[55]. ALPS plans to decrease about 62 different radionuclides concentration with an effective efficiency. The water in the tank is a mixture of intentionally injected cooling waters and retrieved groundwater, both of which were contaminated by their interactions with the extremely radioactive nuclear reactor cores. As shown in Fig. 6, in 2011, Japan's nuclear power plants were reviewed and refurbished, leading to a drastic reduction in the number of nuclear reactors. Consequently, Japan's nuclear energy consumption percentage declined, and reactors that had been reviewed and approved for use began to be commissioned after 2015. The sharp decrease of Japan's nuclear energy consumption after the nuclear accident may cause significant impact on Japan's energy structure.

Fig. 6 Nuclear energy consumption percentage in Japan during year 1965 to 2022
2.2 Treatment of radioactive wastewater

ALPS systems and the Kurion system were applied in radioactive wastewater treatment, which aim to remove the 62 radionuclides in the tank water. The Kurion zeolite system and the Simplified Active Water Retrieve and Recovery System (SARRY system), both of them use silicotitanate, are the two fundamental treatment systems that reduce the content of radiocesium from water supplied back to reactors for cooling. The ALPS pumping and filtration system try to eliminate 62 radionuclides from contaminated water through a sequence of chemical processes. However, tritium cannot be removed from the wastewater only by ALPS system[60]. The Kurion system includes adsorption beds that are specifically designed to separate radiocesium, an ultafiltration unit (UF) to remove colloidal materials, and stainless steel filters (SS filters) to remove coarse particles[60]. The transition metal hexacyanoferrate products CsTreat and sodium titanate SrTreat, respectively, are key players in the elimination of radiocesium and radiostrontium in ALPS[60]. However, monitoring of the nuclear wastewater in the storage tanks did not meet expectations. A few news reports also mentioned the unstable treatment of the ALPS system. According to TEPCO data, ALPS's efficacy in treating 90Sr was incredibly unpredictable. 90Sr activity concentrations in parts of the water exceeded the discharge concentration limit by a significant margin, reaching 104 Bq/L. (Japanese domestic standard: 30 Bq/L)[55, 61-62]. The Japanese domestic maximum release criteria for 137Cs and 90Sr are 90 Bq/L and 30 Bq/L respectively. Both 137Cs and 90Sr in WHO standards are 10 Bq/L[55, 62]. The average of 90Sr concentration in area B, G1 South, G3, J2, J5, G3, J1, and K2 is at a high level, which is 6 414, 1 324, 598, 33 543.3, 398, 478, 1 454, and 147 Bq/L respectively. Some tanks' Sr and Cs concentrations exceed Japanese domestic and WHO standards, like G1 in J1 area (61 and 4 550 Bq/L) and A1 in G3 area (82 and 30 500 Bq/L). Multiple excess radionuclides were detected in the tank water, thus TEPCO undertook secondary treatment of a portion of the nuclear wastewater with the ALPS systems. More than 60 elements exist in storage tanks, including Cs, and Sr, exceeded the intended safe range. As shown in Fig. 7, it compares the areas where both Cs and Sr exceeded the standard of WHO international drinking water (10 Bq/m3). The Cs and Sr concentration in tanks (nearly 500 tanks and 36 areas) were detected by TEPCO on September 30, 2023. The number of measured tanks in H6(I), J2, J1, G3, and K1 was 4, 6, 20, and 4 respectively. Both Cs and Sr concentration in 5 of 36 detected areas (H6(I), J2, J1, G3, and K1) exceeds the international drinking water standard. The H6(I) and G3 areas have the most serious percentage of exceedances. In addition, the number of barrels with Cs concentration exceeding the international drinking water standard reached 10 tanks and areas in J2, J1, H6(I), G3, and K1. The number of barrels with Sr concentrations exceeding the international drinking water standard reached 68 tanks, which were mainly distributed in areas B, G1, G3, J1, H6(I), J2, J4, J5, K1, and K2.

Source from: Radiation concentration estimates for each tank area (as of September 30, 2023) Fig. 7 Percentage of high-concentration tanks in five main areas
2.3 Discharge of radioactive wastewater

Fig. 8 shows structure and scheme of radionuclide liquid storage and discharge plan in Japan. The ALPS treated water is transferred into a treated water pump tank and diluted with seawater. Based on the discharging program, the diluted wastewater is emitted through a 1 km length pipe into the ocean. The government gave TEPCO permission to discharge the treated wastewater into the ocean over a 30-year period on April 13th. About 31, 200 tons of wastewater tanks were planned to be discharged into the ocean until March 2024, when just 10 of the 1 000 tanks will be emptied and the empty tanks will be continuously filled with wastewater from the FDNPP[63]. According to the latest data, the mean value of 90Sr and 137Cs in tanks achieves 1 575 Bq/L and 2.6 Bq/L, respectively[64]. For the concentration of 90Sr, it does not meet the Japanese government criteria or WHO drinking water standard. The concentration of 137Cs meets the criteria of the Japanese government and WHO criteria. However, analysis of accurate data still needs further confirmation and evaluation.

Source from https://www.tepco.co.jp/en/decommission/progress/treated-water-lan/index-e.html Fig. 8 Schematic display of Japan's Nuclear wastewater storage and discharge
2.4 Impact on the fishing industry and marine ecosystem

The fishing industry will face the problem of reduced exports and a long-term reduction in seafood consumption. The study by Guo et al[65] confirms this view that the continued discharge into the sea led to decrease the exportation of Japanese seafood and caused around 259 million USD in losses.

A range of economic and environmental impacts have been studied in relation to the ocean discharge[66-67]. However, the study[68] pointed out that while concentrations and annual human intake of the major radioactive elements of tritium (1 μSv/year) did not have a direct negative impact on fish and humans in a short time, there was still concern for the potential effects of radioactive heavy metals, especially Sr and Cs, which are the two of the ten main radionuclides in the tanks. Cs is mainly deposited in the ocean because of its high distribution coefficient KD value. Although the concentration of Cs in nuclear wastewater in the storage tanks was very low, according to the data, low concentrations of radioactive Cs remaining in sediments may still be accumulated in benthic organisms. The Cs may accumulate in the bodies of predators through the food web. Some studies have shown that the radiation activity of nuclear wastewater in the storage tanks can be completely reduced to a biologically acceptable level after 40 years.

Another species in the region that has shown accumulation of Cs+ is crab. Bendriss et al[69] found that crab's intestines may reach 13 600 Bq90Sr and 1 300 Bq137Cs. Activity concentrations of 90Sr Macroalgae in surrounding marines may reach 170 Bq/kg[70]. Therefore, if radioactive wastewater is dumped into the ocean, there is a risk of environmental harm for hundreds or thousands of years to come. Through predation, seafood networks establish strong connections amongst marine organisms. Besides the Fukushima industry, further environmental recovery and sustainable development may be prevented by the nuclear wastewater discharging program[71]. Because of the 30-year discharge procedure, local businesses may suffer, and the post-disaster socioeconomic recovery may be hampered by the spread of false information among customers[71]. This phenomenon could be caused by the distrust of the government discharging program and the concern about water quality.

Thus, the decision by the government and TEPCO will have an impact on the export and import of marine products both domestically and internationally. Wu et al[66]showed that that nuclear wastewater discharging had an impact on a total loss of 2 348×106 US$ in 23 countries under scenario 1 (the Japanese fishery products final demand may decline by 34.4%). The effects of the radioactive wastewater were amplified and diluted by the ocean currents. Fisheries in neighboring nations and areas across the Pacific Rim may be directly impacted by Japan's release of radioactive effluent[64].

3 Development of nuclear wastewater treatment technology

The potential capacities of different technologies for the Cs+ and Sr2+ removal can be evaluated by[67, 72-73]:

Qe=(C0Cf)Vm; (1)
KD=(C0Cf)CfVm; (2)
Re=(C0Cf)C0100% 。 (3)

where Qe is the equilibrium sorption capacity[72-73], mg/g. The Re indicates the removal rates[67, 74] of Cs+ and Sr2+. V is the solution volume for the test and m(g) is the mass of (ion exchanger or chemical and physical absorbent) that participate in Cs+ and Sr2+ removal processes.

3.1 Chemical precipitation

Chemical precipitation involves the interaction between dissolved metals and a precipitation agent in aqueous environment, leading to the formation of metal precipitation, which is widely applied in industry scale[75]. Further application of flocculation using coagulants can increase the size of precipitation particles to separate the particles from wastewater and transform them into sludge[76]. As shown in Tab. 2[77-83], in a study of Bengiat et al[84], it was discovered that aqueous organic ligand can promote the Supramolecular complexation between 137Cs and the rigid ligand, resulting in the selective precipitation of 137Cs in solution. Concerning Sr precipitation, the phosphate and carbonate pathways are predominantly targeted, leading to the formation of Sr3(PO4)2 and SrCO3. The study highlighted that approximately 1 kg of solid residue with a total beta activity of 100 MBq can be obtained by wastewater treatment of one cubic metre. The resulting effluent exhibited extremely low radioactivity levels, with 0.6 kBq/L for Sr and 0.2 kBq/L for 14C[85]. Tokunaga et al[85] utilized barite (BaSO4) to remove more than 90% Sr in a marine water environment. This material (BaSO4) shows potential for application in nuclear wastewater treatment. The study of Hodkin et al[80] offers the possibility of coprecipitation of 14C and Sr, but the resulting high intensity solid residue treatment has not been investigated which may limited methods application in industry. In addition, the method is applicable to nuclear wastewater treatment in groundwater, but further studies are still needed for the crystallization and occurring recrystallization of carbonates in different aqueous environments (e.g., treatment of Sr in Fukushima wastewater).

Tab. 2 Comparison of different nuclear wastewater treatment technologies

The Bengiat et al[84]and Tokunaga et al[85] methods, however, cannot remove Sr and Cs at the same time and are merely effective for one of these. Application of more than two methods to remove Sr and Cs will make the treatment process more complicated. Wu et al[86] pointed out that the hydraulic pellet co-precipitation microfiltration (HPC-MF) process is a chemical precipitation method in the application of Sr removal. When the concentration of seed crystal was 0.3 g/L, the sodium carbonate dose was 1 000 g/L, and ferric chloride dose was 10 g/L, and strontium could be effectively removed. Moreover, previous research has proposed the co-precipitation of stable and radioactive isotopes as a method to enhance process performance due to their similar chemical properties[87]. It is crucial to understand that a significant amount of radioactive slurry is inevitably produced because of chemical precipitation. As shown in Fig. 9, another approach for the removal of 137Cs involves co-precipitation with K4[Fe(CN)6] ·3H2O and BaSO4. The effectiveness of 137Cs removal during BaSO4 co-precipitation and K4[Fe(CN)6] ·3H2O processes can be significantly improved by increasing the Fe3+ concentration in the wastewater[79]. The optimal conditions for the removal of 137Cs and 60Co have been determined to be 0.001 M K4[Fe(CN)6] ·3H2O and 0.003 M Fe3+, respectively. For the removal of 90Sr, a [Ba2+] ∶[SO42-] ratio of 1 ∶2 with a [Ba2+] concentration of 0.06 M must be achieved. By following these conditions, the radioactivity of the wastewater in solution can be reduced from 37.7 to below 0.05 Bq/mL for 137Cs, and 0.37 to 0.02 Bq/mL for 90Sr. However, the problems of current applications are in the separation between solids and liquids after precipitation and in the disposal of solid wastes. Most studies have focused on the effectiveness of different chemical precipitations for the removal of single radionuclides or multi-nuclide removal.

Fig. 9 Schematic display of efficient treatment technology for radioactive Sr and Cs containing nuclear wastewater
3.2 Adsorption using different adsorbents

The process of physical adsorption involves the heavy metals diffusional movement into the carbon adsorbents' pores. The adsorbents' surface area and distribution of pore size significantly affect physical adsorption[88]. The adsorption mechanism is determined by adsorbents properties and heavy metals, as well as temperature, adsorbent amount, pH value, adsorption time, and initial metal ion concentration. Previous studies have examined the removal rate of Cs+ and Sr2+ using various adsorbents, including sodium manganese silicate (Tab. 2) Hydroxyapatite (HA)[89], titanium doped hydroxyapatite (Ti-HA)[90], TitanoSilicate (DTS)[77], bentonite, attapulgite, and zeolite[91-92] and hydrate pelletizing[90]. Shen et al[81] carried out a study on the production of sodium manganese silicate (SMSO) using the one-pot hydrothermal method. The findings revealed that SMSO exhibits a consistently high absorption capacity, with an Sr2+ removal rate of nearly 98% across a wide range of pH values (3-12). Furthermore, SMSO demonstrated effective removal of competing ions. The study highlights the potential application of SMSO in Sr2+ absorption[93]. The Fiskum et al[94] point out that application of spherical resorcinol-formaldehyde resin in the Cs removal did not result in a high absorption capacity, as this was inhibited by higher temperatures. After 17 process cycles, it was discovered that when the temperature rose from 25℃ to 45℃ there was a 17% decrease in the Cs capacity of the sRF resin [0.09 M K simulant][94]. A tin antimonate sorbent was created by Zhang et al[95] to remove strontium and cobalt ions.Nanoscale rutile crystals and phyrochlore structure comprise the sorbent. Tin antimonate exhibits a significant strontium-binding capability in the pH range of 2-12[95]. Rae et al[74] studied the biosorbents (crab carapace and spent distillery grain).The major processes for Sr2+ removal that were indicated by the characterization of biosorbents (crab carapace) both before and after Sr2+ sorption were ion-exchange and outer- sphere complexation.Removal of Sr2+ at concentrations that are relevant to industry from aqueous media (adsorption capacity: 3.92 mg/g). Schematic of adsorption method was displayed in Fig. 10.

Fig. 10 Four main nuclear wastewater treatment technologies (absorption and ion exchange)

Kim et al[77] observed that DTS maintains a high ability to adsorb Sr2+ and Cs+ under various conditions, including contaminated underground water, tap water, and seawater. Within tap water and groundwater contaminated systems, the Cs+ and Sr2+ KD values were discovered to outweigh 105 mL/g (% removal >99%), indicating the DTS displayed a well effectiveness in these ions simultaneous removement[77]. Li et al[91] conducted an analysis of six different adsorbents. The results ranked the adsorption efficiency of Sr as follows: zeolite, bentonite, attapulgite, montmorillonite, activated carbon, and kaolin. Zeolite had the maximum capacity for adsorption of 4.1 mg/g among them.

3.3 Membrane filtration

Membrane filtration has been extensively researched and applied in recent years, including the use of MOF (metal-organic framework)/graphene oxide, nanoribbon-based Nickel-MOF composites, and polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel membranes. The study conducted by Wang et al[96] demonstrated that a graphene oxide (GO) membrane's reaction to pH results in a high selectivity and permeability for monovalent salt ions, specifically Sr2+. The interaction between the NH3 and GO functional groups can be accelerated, and the decoration of GO with N-groups can be enhanced through the application of NH3 vapors in GO membrane N-functionalization[97]. This method prevents composite sheet aggregation[96]. Experimental results indicate that the Sr2+ recovery percentages range from 35% to 60% with multi-reusability, and the ideal Sr absorption capacity can reach 475 mg/g. Regardless of the exposure duration of NH3 and precursor GO membrane, the Sr absorption capacity can be enhanced twice by GO membranes with functionalized nitrogen groups. The synthesis of MOF/graphene oxide (GO) composite membranes involves the suction filtration of electrostatic self-assembly Ni-MOF (Ni-MOF nanobelts) and GO sheets. These membranes have freestanding forms in addition to interlaced structures[98]. Batch experiments conducted after a 24-h adsorption period showed that the membrane with a high Ni-MOF content had an optimal Sr2+ removing capacity, outperforming both bare GO and a membrane with a low level of Ni-MOF content (2 mg)[98]. The desalination and reverse osmosis membranes were assessed by Kim et al.[99] in the Cs, Co and Sr separation in seawater. For single nuclide, RO membrane rejection is greater than 93%, and for mixed nuclide separation, it is much higher than 98%. Although both membranes maintained good adsorption capacity in the experiments, the removal capacity of the membranes after multiple uses was not well evaluated. Some membrane technologies such as polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane[100] showed wide applications for Cs+ and Sr2+ removal. However, the removal of Sr and Cs isotopes (radioactive hazardous solutions) was not supported by good experimental results. Schematic of membrane filtration was displayed in Fig. 10.

3.4 Ion exchange

Ion exchange is a process used to decontaminate radioactive wastewater by employing inorganic and organic exchange materials, as well as composites. In their study, Zhu et al[101] utilized cadmium selenidostannate, [CH3NH3]3[NH4]3Cd4Sn3Se13 ·3H2O (CdSnSe-1), to accomplish ion exchange and capture Sr2+ and Cs+ using mono-lacunary super tetrahedral clusters (a microporous Cd-Sn-Se). The results demonstrated effective removal/adsorption of Cs+ and Sr2+ from slightly contaminated nuclear wastewater, with their levels substantially reduced. The superhigh exchange capacities were recorded as 371.4 mg/g for Cs+ and 128.4 mg/g for Sr2+. Li et al[102] studied potential materials ([Me2NH2]6In10S18 and [MeNH3]5.5[Me2NH2]0.5In10S18 ·7H2O), which are three-dimensional (3D) cluster-based microporous metal sulfides to remove the Cs and Sr in wastewater. The removal rate was 95.7% and 96.2% after two absorption cycles. Inorganic sorbents such as titanosilicates and hexacyanoferrates AkMn[Fe(CN)6] have been utilized in ion exchange due to their chemical and radiation stability[103]. The Behrens et al[104] evaluated the Sr and Cs Na4Ti9O20 ·xH2O with underground water and aqueous waste scenario all the ion exchanger removal of 89Sr outweigh 97%, and the removal of 137Cs outweigh 97%. However, there was a lack of the removal of 90Sr assessment and the experiments may require an assessment of in a scenario with solution full of competitive ions. Amesh et al[105] found the titanate based compound, sodium iron titanate (NaFeTiO) ion exchange processes for the Cs and Sr removing. It was discovered that strontium absorption capacity was 233 mg/g and that KD values of Sr rose up to pH 6. On NaFeTiO, the rate of caesium and strontium ion exchange was fast during the first 200 minutes of equilibration, and equilibrium was thereafter established.

3.5 Bioremediation

Utilizing microorganisms or plants to get rid of toxins from the environment at a reduced cost is known as bioremediation, and it can be expanded to remove contaminants from soil, air, and water[106]. Through the use of green plants, phytoremediation transfers, absorbs, or changes contaminants so they are safe for the environment[107-108]. A series of studies showed the possibility of the application of algae organism and bacteria inbioremediation[109-110]. The two kinds of brown algea Saccharina japonica and Sargassum horneri can be an potential effective biosorbents for absorbing superfluous Sr2+ in seawater[82]. S. japonica and S.horneri had Sr2+ concentrations of 5 534 mg/kg and 9 320 mg/kg, respectively. These were >90 and 230 times the Sr2+ concentration in seawater (7.4±0.4 mg/L), respectively. Recent research has pointed out that the Gloeomargarita lithophora with the function of intracellular calcium carbonates forming has a high absorption (radionuclide removal 99%) rate of 90Sr and 226Ra in solution and 90Sr activity declined by 45.3 kBq/L in 1 h[109].

4 Soil and water conservation technologies 4.1 Technologies in soil radionuclides (Cs and Sr)

The migration of pollutants, including Sr and Cs, into deeper soil profiles can lead to water and soil erosion, which can be mitigated through soil and water conservation measures (SWCM). Various chemical and physical methods, such as interpolyelectrolyte complexes (IPCS)[110-112], flue gas desulfurization gypsum[113], inorganic coagulants[114], divalent and monovalent ion washing agents[115], and ordinary Portland cement-based binders[116], are widely applied in soil and water conservation programs. According to Zezin et al[112] IPCs effectively reduced wind erosion, resulting in soil removal of < 0.5 mg/min under wind speeds of < 40 m/s. The stability of the IPCs, also known as IPCs binders, was promoted by the cooperative character of multisite electrostatic complexation with polyelectrolyte counterparts, which was related to the splitting up of polyelectrolyte counterparts[112]. The vicinity of the Chernobyl catastrophe has seen extensive usage of IPCs[112], which developed a structured top layer that solidified after drying and turned plastic after additional wetting. This is due to water's potent plasticizing impact on IPCs, which allowed for some swelling but not water dissolution[117]. The process involves extracting radionuclides from contaminated finely divided soil fractions with different densities[112]. Mikheikin et al[111] found that IPCs allow for the recovery and concentration of up to 95% of the radionuclides into a tiny volume (10%-15% of the original one)[111]. For inorganic coagulants, K+ and Ca2+ solutions represented a high outweigh of the 0.075 M EDTA and 0.05 M phosphoric acid, which both lowered the efficiency of Sr and Cs removal rate below the 40%. According to Wan et al[113], removal rates of Sr and Cs were found to be 68.2% and 81.3% in Ca2+ and K+ solutions (produced from dissolving CaCl2 and KCl in distilled water), respectively. However, the change of soil chemical and physical properties before and after washing by the K+ and Ca2+ solutions requires an assessment to make a comprehensive comparison with the traditional inorganic coagulant[113].

Additionally, phytoremediation and plant cover, which act as biobinders and stabilizers to accomplish removal and release the impact on soil contaminants, are also applied in Cs and Sr soil pollution treatment[118-119]. Recent research showed that two main species, Alstonia scholaris and Arabidopsis halleri, perform well in Cs and Sr treatment. A.halleri, a hyperaccumulator, can absorb substantial concentrations of several metals into its above-ground organs (e.g., leaves) without exhibiting noticeable toxicity[120]. It accumulated Sr more quickly than Cs, with transfer factors for Sr (>184) compared to Cs (>16). The findings showed a favorable association between the buildup of Cs and Sr and the transfer of K and Ca to leaves. Singh et al[121] pointed out that the absorption pattern of A.scholaris for calcium was 5 452.8-24 771.4 mg/kg DW (TF (transfer factor)=85.2-57.6), whereas the uptake pattern for sulfur was 1 307.4-8 705.7 mg/kg DW (TF=85.3-1.46). The improvement of plant cover effectively prevented soil erosion and change soil properties, which reduced the migration and diffusion of radionuclides (Cs and Sr) in the soil[121].

4.2 Water conservation technologies in catchment and basin

The nuclear leakage accident at Chernobyl led to the redistribution of pollutant 137Cs through soil and water erosion and fluvial processes, which was redistributed to downstream and surrounding areas[122-123]. Research indicated that soil loss from cultivated fields reduced the 137Cs inventories in catchment and basins, thereby limiting the migration and transformation of pollutants in surrounding areas[123]. The mobilized sediment from catchment slopes may reach the river system through the local relief and the complexity of the river and basin delivery system, affecting different pathways of the river system in Fukushima[123]. The Abukuma River valley, located in the interior, was less erosive to rainfall than coastal plains and mountain ranges, as indicated by studies in Fukushima[122-126]. Almost all the 137Cs (96.5%) of the Abukuma River were emitted into the ocean, occupying 12 TBq in total between June 2011 and August 2015. According to Taniguchi et al.[124], urban areas, farmland, and paddy fields were the primary sources of 137Cs fluvial transport, accounting for 85% of the discharging sources in 38% of the watershed areas. According to Yamashiki et al.[125-126], 84%-92% of the radiocesium in the basin moved and transferred through the river system as particles. The Abukuma basin, which was thought to be the most affected by the FDNPP accidents, showed high concentration radiocesium fluxes. The combination of ozone and tannic acid-based organic composite adsorbents may efficiently remove several radionuclides from rivers, throughout an extensive temperature and pH spectrum (1.9-7.6). The maximum absorption capacity of Cs and Sr achieved 1.8×10-3 mol/g and 5.6×10-4 mol/g, respectively[126]. Additionally, the complex absorbents for I- and IO3- represented a high level, exceeding more than tenfold magnitudes compared to other materials like Ag2O-T3NT (Titanate nanolamina with Ag2O nanocrystals) with 571 mg/g[127] and microporous zirconium silicate with 216 mg/g[128]. In Tab. 3[129-142], other materials also indicate a great level, such as Caustic-pretreated-yeast-poly(acrylic acid) (Cs: 229.5 mg/g; Sr: 166.8 mg/g)[129] and pre-activated clinoptilolite (Cs: 140 mg/g; Sr: 52 mg/g)[131]. However, there is a lack of river condition experiments to evaluate their performance.

Tab. 3 Comparison of different soil and water conservation technologies
4.3 Soil and water conservation technologies in groundwater

The majority of ions in groundwater, including radionuclides, are retained via reverse osmosis (RO). The concentrated retentate stream (usually 10%-15% of the initial volume) from the RO system contained the radionuclides and common ions found in groundwater, requiring treatment before disposal[143]. A Prussian blue and graphene oxide modified nanofiltration membrane was fabricated to remove radionuclides Cs+ and Sr2+[131]. Effective rejection of caesium (Cs+, 99.5%) and strontium (Sr2+, 97.5%) was accomplished by the modified membrane. Even after treating naturally occurring surface water that contained a variety of inorganic salts and organic materials, its Cs+ rejection rate was still high (about 96%). Another membrane of carbon nanotube membranes with Ar/O2 plasma-treated, presented a high selectivity on Cs+ and Sr2+[47]. The membrane maintained selectivity for monovalent cations (perhaps due to electrostatic interactions) whereas divalent cations promoted the development of inner-sphere complexation[135]. According to Ali et al[135], the functionalized carbon nanotube membranes' distribution coefficients (KD) for divalent cations, such as Sr2+, were determined to be 4.4 mmol/g, whereas those for monovalent cations, such as Cs+, were 0.8 mmol/g. The highest Cs and Sr KD values were found in plasma-functionalized MWCNT (P-MWCNT) membrane, which reached 4.4 mmol/g and around 1.1 mmol/g in a real wastewater sample[135]. The seawater reverse osmosis membrane (SW 30) achieves a Cs+ removal rate between 92%-96% and a Sr2+ removal rate of 99%. The Cs+ and Sr2+ removal rates of the high rejection seawater reverse osmosis membrane (SW 30 HR) are above 96% and reach 99%, respectively[133].

Fig. 11 illustrates the process of PRB (Permeable Reactive Barriers) treatment, which involves vertically positioning a reactive media in line with the direction of groundwater flow to trap pollutants and radionuclides under natural hydraulic gradients[137]. The passive, in situ treatment of groundwater using PRB is a reasonably priced technique[144].Only the removal of 99Tc and 90Sr at scale demonstrated the effectiveness of PRBs, a less invasive alternative[137]. To intercept the pollutant plume beneath naturally occurring hydraulic gradients, a PRB must be positioned its reactive media perpendicular to the direction of groundwater flow[136]. The Torres et al[136] study pointed out that activity concentrations showed a slower secondary reduction (λ2) after a year. Although enabling groundwater to flow through the barrier, the reactive medium changed pollutants into an immobile or less dangerous form. The ability of microwave(MW) to remove Cs from GAC (granular activated carbon) was demonstrated by regeneration yield (δ=79%-110%) and WL weight loss (6.8% for 10 cycles) values in lab-scale data[144].

Fig. 11 The PRS technology in underground water treatment
4.4 Soil and water conservation technologies in different land use

The study by Kitamura et al[145] assessed the soil erosion of 137Cs in crop fields using soil and water conservation technologies (SACT). Crop fields lose the most soil on average per unit area, with wasteland coming in second. The annual soil erosion of crop fields and forest areas per unit area reached 8 t/(hm2 ·a) and 0.6 t/(hm2 ·a), respectively, with 67% of the initial radiocesium remaining in forested landscapes[145]. Additionally, a series of engineering appliances were built after the Fukushima accident (e.g., groundwater bypass, bore rehabilitation, ice wall, and subdrain system) to isolate pollutants migration and expand[146-147].

4.4.1 Forestry land use

Forest areas are the primary source of Cs migration in eastern Fukushima. Although forest study areas only caused 24% of the total soil loss, the137Cs migration accounted for 64%. In Japan, alpine meadows and foothills were used as pastures[122]. Forest areas continued to represent more stable repositories of contaminants[137]. According to Onda et al[50] 2 600 km2 of forest received fallout >100 kBq/m2, accounting for the majority of FDNPP 137Cs fallout in the terrestrial environment. The Konoplev et al[122] study noted that conifers, which can better intercept and remove radioactive and aerosol particles, were relatively efficient in removing radionuclides such as 137Cs from forest land. Some studies indicated that the removal of woods and trees increased surface runoff[145, 148]. The study pointed out that the special species can maintained a higher soil hydraulic conductivity and prevent the surface runoff compared to the livestock grazed forest[148]. When livestock graze beneath trees, their ability to mitigate flooding was compromised[148]. Planting specific trees, which had a trait of low depositional fluxes of radionuclides, can limited the accumulation of Cs and Sr pollution in forest areas' soil. The cedar can be a potential species to prevent radionuclide spreading. The study by Feng et al[139] pointed out that the 137Cs flux generated from the oak (Quercus serrata) and cedar (Camellia japonica) stands was 2 810 and 375 Bq/(m2 ·a), respectively. The higher 137 Cs flux provided more air-source pollution[140]. The study results were similar to the previous discovery, which found that deciduous trees and grasslands were less effective interceptors and scavengers of radioactive and aerosol particles. Additionally, the Cs and Sr distributions inside the trees were different in the canopy, root, and leaves. The results revealed that 20%-40% of foliar 137Cs were located inside the leaf, while 60%-80% clung to the leaf surface[149]. Before the accident, the 137Cs/133Cs ratios within the sprouting leaves were significantly greater than those found in the soil extract and lower than those found in bulk precipitation and throughfall. During or shortly after radioactive fallout, the foliar uptake and subsequent translocation of 137Cs are significant contamination vectors in a variety of tree species[149]. The sedum can also be an option for the soil in the rhizosphere of Phyllostachys violascens. The growth and uptake of heavy metals by bamboo and sedum intercropping enhanced the overall extraction of heavy metals that were accessible[150].

The radionuclides were retained by clay mineral layers[151-152]. The primary determinant of the radiocesium interception potential was micaceous minerals[151]. For radioactive soil, hydrothermal treatment produced effective Cs desorption (96%). With an increase in treatment temperature, Mg2+ diffused into collapsed interlayers from the near-edge to the central area, easily substituting anhydrous Cs+ from these regions[152]. The Cs could be almost removed at 250℃[152].

4.4.2 Agricultural land use

The plant's root system plays an important role in increasing the pollutants and plants contact area, accelerating absorption procedure. Meanwhile, the function of remaining soil stabilization, curbing erosion, and reducing water permeation can be contributed by extensive plant root systems[150]. The majority of sediment (μ 76, σ 14%) was supplied by fluvisols, an alluvial soil type that was commonly used for paddy fields, according to the results of geochemical modelling[153]. For the agricultural land use areas, phytoremediation sustainable strategies to prevent the nuclear spreading by the potential soil and conservation problems. In polluted soil, phytoextraction effectively eliminates contaminants like radionuclides and heavy metals[154]. Heavy metal radionuclides in the soil can be taken up by roots and moved to parts or shoots that can be harvested. This process includes metal mobilization, uptake, compartmentation, and chelation[111, 155]. The A.halleri, Vetiveria zizanoides, Helianthus annuus, and Amaranthus plants are the main species in 137Cs and 90Sr phytoextraction research and common exist in farmland areas[120, 141, 156-157]. According to Burger et al[120], A.halleri is a hyperaccumulator plant species. It can absorb a lot of different radionuclide metals into its above-ground organs[120].The highest transfer factors of Cs and Sr achieved around 16.5 and 184 under conditions of Cs concentration(0.02 mM) and Sr concentration (0.01 mM). The study pointed out that toxic effects will impact the transfer factors and plant growth under different Cs and Sr concentrations[120]. H. annuus has a co-contribution with bacillus (Bacillus cereus) as a bioaugmentation for absorbing, fixing, and migrating soil radionuclides. B.cereus increased sunflower's Y (yritrium) and La (lanthanum) concentrations by a factor of 21 and 38.3. It also increased clover biomass for aerial portions by a factor of 3.7[158]. Calotropis gigantea also exhibited an ideal effect on radionuclide phytoextraction. The C. gigantea absorbed 90% of the metal under 90Sr(5×103 kBq/l) within 24 h. The removal rate increased by 97% after 168 h. The Cs removal rate reached 44% under 137Cs (5×103 kBq/l) solution after 168 h[155]. Kobayashi et al[159] examined the migration factors of thirteen species from Asteraceae, Fabaceae, and Poaceae in shallow and deeply cultivated fields. The research indicated that the 137Cs concentrations in shallowly cultivated fields were higher than those in deeply cultivated fields. In the deep field, 137Cs shallow field transfer factors ranged from 0.019 to 0.130. The transfer factors of 137Cs for plants cultivated in the deep field varied from 0.022 to 0.130[159]. According to Burger et al[120], Plantago major had a high potential for absorbing radionuclides Cs and Sr in leaves and roots. The leaves absorbed 47 mg/kg dry weight (DW) of Cs under 0.2 mM concentration of Cs. The DW of Sr absorption from leaves achieved 105.8 mg/kg with the condition of 100 mM Sr. Researchers have used P. major to migrate and remediate pesticides and insecticides. It showed significant potential for radioactive heavy metal remediation[160]. Previous studies showed that P. major has been applied to the migration and treatment of pesticides[161]. It also demonstrates great promise for application in radioactive heavy metal treatment.

Tillage system alternation and change are commonly used to reduce the transport and spread of sediment and pollution caused by soil erosion[162]. Different tillage systems also contributed to preventing radionuclide migration in crops[163-164]. Li et al[164] indicated that three different tillage systems (no tillage (NT), moldboard plow (MP), and rotary cultivation (RC)) impacted the vertical distribution of 137Cs and the transfer factor from soil to crops. The study results showed that under the NT and RC treatments, the amount of 137Cs in the soil decreased exponentially with depth. The concentration of 137Cs in crops increased due to the greater ExCs/exchangeable K ratio in the surface soil. Compared to NT, the transfer factor for soybean grain was significantly lower in MP and RC. The NT method has several environmental protection advantages, and induced soil inversion significantly reduces crop radiocesium pollution. It would be appropriate to reverse tillage in order to counteract the nuclear disaster[163-164]. However, NT is a way to quickly reduce the accumulation of Cs and Sr radioactive in the soil. This result is similar to the previous study in the River Wensum Demonstration Test Catchment[165].

5 Discussion

The binding sites in the ion-exchange materials limited the effectiveness of Cs and Sr removal under Fukushima scenario. For practical consideration, membrance, membrane and co-precipitation technologies are relatively suitable methods for removing Cs and Sr from tanks. When using phytoremediation, it is necessary to consider how long radionuclides will live in the tank water environment, and the process takes longer than membrane and co-precipitation technologies. In terms of cost, certain membrane technologies can facilitate multiple-use filtration and yield superior removal outcomes. The co-precipitation method is highly effective but may be costlier compared to membrane filtration. For bioremediation, many factors, including precipitation, temperature, and human management, nevertheless restrict the long-term phytoremediation effects.

Soil and water conservation measures can prevent the migration and diffusion of various radioactive elements in soil and other landuses. For example, forest land management methods focus on selecting local tree species. A forest cleanup initiative applied this technology, covering 70% of the Fukushima-affected area's geographic expanse. To reduce pollutant fluxes both vertically and horizontally in the woodland, C. japonica is a suitable selection. Furthermore, a combination of multi-tree and grass species to achieve low pollutant flux in forestry areas can be used. However, there is little research in this area, so the construction of low-pollutant flux woodlands (including multiple trees and grasses) still requires further investigation. Soil and water conservation measures for forests and agricultural use focus on sustainability and environmentally friendly phytoremediation. The agricultural lands should consider some crops, such as H. annuus, to constantly remove Cs and Sr.

While analogous technologies, such as ground frozen shield, address groundwater contamination following the Fukushima nuclear accident, PRS and reverse osmosis technology can be utilized in the vicinity of the FDNPP and in specific zones of elevated groundwater contamination. This technology can also be utilized for addressing radioactive wastewater leaks and mitigating the dissemination of toxins resulting from severe weather events.

6 Conclusions

Treatment of radioactive nuclear wastewater encompasses various technologies while each offers unique advantages and challenges. Chemical precipitation, with its ability to form metal precipitates, can be enhanced through flocculation and the use of organic ligands for selective removal of contaminants. Multi-nuclide separation of solids and liquids after chemical precipitation is the main challenge for this technique in nuclear wastewater treatment. Previous studies point out that membranes and adsorption are the most developed technologies[135]. Membrane filtration has a complete design (like thermal-driven processes), but most of them are under lab scale, and membrane adsorption is limited to the number of times it can be used. Nanosorption and membrane filtration expensive cost limits large-scale application for Fukushima nuclear wastewater treatment, although some studies claim that the materials can be applied several times.

For the Fukushima accident, new technology using KFe[Fe(CN)6] and BaSO4 co-precipitation can be applied in nuclear wastewater treatment, based on the above analysis. The technology fills the gaps of 90Sr and 137Cs rapid co-removing from complex acidic wastewater, Sr and Cs concentrations can be reduced by an order of magnitude. Nanosorption and membrane filtering can be employed to remediate specific casks in the Fukushima storage site containing high concentration of Sr and Cs. This mitigates the potential of radioactive wastewater leaking from the casks and its release into the ocean. The plants like C. japonica and H. annuuscan may be applied in agricultural areas treatment. Soil and water conservation strategies are recommended to impede the dispersion of migrating Strontium and Cesium across various settings and media.

This article addresses the deficiency in research about integrated treatment technologies for Sr and Cs in Fukushima. It proposes employing phytoremediation, soil and water conservation, and related technologies to address nuclear wastewater treatment and the dispersion of radionuclides (Sr and Cs) in Fukushima. However, this article lacks estimates of the costs of individual technologies' application of Cs and Sr. Calculations of maximum adsorption capacity and KD values for different technologies are incomplete due to lacking relevant data.

Future research should focus on considering the application of improvement in radioactive elements removal efficiency. The future study will concentrate on minimising costs and enhancing the practical application of co-precipitation technology. Soil and water conservation strategies in forestry regions should establish various vegetation systems to mitigate pollution fluxes. Although there are many reports that the tritium content in the tanks exceeds the limit and the Japanese government has implemented a tritium dilution program, the residues of other radioactive heavy metals may still be harmful to the environment. Therefore, further removal of radioactive Cs, Sr, and other metal elements from the tanks is necessary.

7 参考文献
[1]
PRǍVǍLIE R, BANDOC G. Nuclear energy: Between global electricity demand, worldwide decarbonisation imperativeness, and planetary environmental implications[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018(209): 81.
[2]
FAWCETT A A, IYER G C, CLARKE L E, et al. Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?[J]. Science, 2015, 350(6265): 1168. DOI:10.1126/science.aad5761
[3]
WEALER B, BAUER S, HIRSCHHAUSEN C V, et al. Investing into third generation nuclear power plants: Review of recent trends and analysis of future investments using monte carlosimulation[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 143: 110836. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110836
[4]
ZHAN Liu, BO Yang, LIN Tian, et al. Development and outlook of advanced nuclear energy technology[J]. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2021, 34: 100630. DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2021.100630
[5]
World Nuclear Association. World nuclear performance report 2023[R/OL]. (2023-09-11)[2024-05-25]. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/nuclear-power-in-the-world-today.aspx.
[6]
Our World in Data. United States: Energy country profile[R/OL]. (2023-09-21)[2024-05-24]. https://ourworldindata.org/energy/country/united-states#what-sources-does-the-country-get-its-energy-from.
[7]
Our World in Data. CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions[R/OL]. (2023-09-21)[2024-05-24]. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions.
[8]
FESENKO S. Review of radiation effects in non-human species in areas affected by the Kyshtym accident[J]. Journal of Radiological Protection, 2019, 39(1): R1. DOI:10.1088/1361-6498/aafa92
[9]
KRYSHEV I I, ROMANOV G N, ISAEVA L N, et al. Radioecological state of lakes in the southern Ural impacted by radioactivity release of the 1957 radiation accident[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 1997, 34(3): 223. DOI:10.1016/0265-931X(96)00033-1
[10]
SHISHKINA E A, STARICHENKO V I, VALEEVA E R, et al. Assessment of herb field mouse (Sylvaemus uralensis) migration in the area of the East Urals Radioactive trace using measurements of bone-seeking 90Sr[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2021(234): 106628.
[11]
KARAVAEVA Y N, KULIKOV N V, MOLCHANOVA I V, et al. Accumulation and distribution of long-living radionuclides in the forest ecosystems of the Kyshtym accident zone[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 1994(157): 147.
[12]
POZOLOTINA V N, MOLCHANOVA I V, KARAVAEVA E N, et al. Radionuclides in terrestrial ecosystems of the zone of Kyshtym accident in the Urals[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2010, 101(6): 438. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.06.011
[13]
FREED R, SMITH L, BUGAI D. The effective source area of 90Sr for a stream near Chernobyl, Ukraine[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2004, 71(1/4): 1.
[14]
TEIEN H C, KASHPAROVA O, SALBU B, et al. Seasonal changes in uptake and depuration of 137Cs and 90Sr in silver Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio) and common rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 786: 147280. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147280
[15]
POVINEC P P, AOYAMA M, BIDDULPHP D, et al. Cesium, iodine and tritium in NW Pacific waters: A comparison of the Fukushima impact with global fallout[J]. Biogeosciences, 2013, 10(8): 5481. DOI:10.5194/bg-10-5481-2013
[16]
YABLOKOV A V, NESTERENKO V B, NESTERENKO A V. Chapter Ⅲ. Consequences of the Chernobyl catastrophe for the environment[J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2009, 1181(1): 221. DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04830.x
[17]
RYABOKON N I, SMOLICH I I, KUDRYASHOV V P, et al. Long-term development of the radionuclide exposure of murine rodent populations in Belarus after the Chernobyl accident[J]. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 2005(44): 169.
[18]
CASTRILLEJO M, CASACUBERTA N, BREIER C F, et al. Reassessment of 90Sr, 137Cs, and 134Cs in the coast off Japan derived from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016(50): 173.
[19]
POVINEC P P, HIROSE K, AOYAMA M. Radiostrontium in the western North Pacific: Characteristics, behavior, and the Fukushima impact[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(18): 10356.
[20]
BEHRENS E, SCHWARZKOPF F U, LVBBECKE J F, et al. Model simulations on the long-term dispersal of 137Cs released into the Pacific Ocean off Fukushima[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2012, 7(3): 034004. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034004
[21]
MADERICH V, JUNG K T, BEZHENAR R, et al. Dispersion and fate of 90Sr in the Northwestern Pacific and adjacent seas: Global fallout and the Fukushima Daiichi accident[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014(494): 261.
[22]
WELLER A, HORI M, SHOZUGAWA K, et al. Rapid ultra-trace determination of Fukushima-derived radionuclides in food[J]. Food Control, 2018(85): 376.
[23]
HATCH M, CARDIS E. Somatic health effects of Chernobyl: 30 years on[J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2017(32): 1047.
[24]
GAUNTT R O, KALINICH D A, CARDONI J N, et al. Fukushima Daiichi accident study: Status as of April 2012 (No. SAND2012-6173)[R]. Albuquerque, NM, and Livermore: Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), 2012, : 3. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc841123/m2/1/high_res_d/1055601.pdf
[25]
TIKHOMIROV F A, SHCHEGLOV A I. Main investigation results on the forest radioecology in the Kyshtym and Chernobyl accident zones[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 1994, 157: 45. DOI:10.1016/0048-9697(94)90564-9
[26]
AARKROG A, DAHLGAARD H, NIELSEN S P, et al. Radioactive inventories from the Kyshtymand Karachay accidents: Estimates based on soil samples collected in the South Urals (1990-1995)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 1997, 201(2): 137. DOI:10.1016/S0048-9697(97)00098-3
[27]
ROMANOV G N, NIKIPELOV B V, DROZHKO E G. The Kyshtym accident: Causes, scale and radiation characteristics[R/OL]. (1990-10-1)[2024-05-24]. https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:25008504.
[28]
AKLEYEV A V, KRESTININA L Y, DEGTEVA M O, et al. Consequences of the radiation accident at the Mayak production association in 1957 (the'Kyshtym Accident')[J]. Journal of Radiological Protection, 2017, 37(3): R19. DOI:10.1088/1361-6498/aa7f8d0)00207-1
[29]
KASHPAROV V A, LUNDIN S M, KHOMUTININ Y V, et al. Soil contamination with 90Sr in the near zone of the Chernobyl accident[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2001, 56(3): 285. DOI:10.1016/S0265-931X(00)00207-1
[30]
KOROBOVA E, ERMAKOV A, LINNIK V. 137Cs and 90Sr mobility in soils and transfer in soil-plant systems in the Novozybkov district affected by the Chernobyl accident[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 1998, 13(7): 803. DOI:10.1016/S0883-2927(98)00021-3
[31]
PETROVIĆ J, ČUJIČ M, DORDEVIĆ M, et al. Spatial distribution and vertical migration of 137 Cs in soils of Belgrade (Serbia) 25 years after the Chernobyl accident[J]. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 2013, 15(6): 1279.
[32]
LABUNSKA I, LEVCHUK S, KASHPAROV V, et al. Current radiological situation in areas of Ukraine contaminated by the Chornobyl accident: Part 2. Strontium-90 transfer to culinary grains and forest woods from soils of Ivankiv district[J]. Environment International, 2021, 146: 106282. DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2020.106282
[33]
LABUNSKA I, KASHPAROV V, LEVCHUK S, et al. Current radiological situation in areas of Ukraine contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: Part 1. Human dietary exposure to Caesium-137 and possible mitigation measures[J]. Environment International, 2018, 117: 250. DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.053
[34]
KASHIWAYA K, MUTO Y, KUBO T, et al. Spatial variations of tritium concentrations in groundwater collected in the southern coastal region of Fukushima, Japan, after the nuclear accident[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 12578. DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-12840-3
[35]
AOYAMA M, KAJINO M, TANAKA T Y, et al. 34Cs and 137Cs in the North Pacific Ocean derived from the March 2011 TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident, Japan. Part two: Estimation of 134Cs and 137Cs inventories in the North Pacific Ocean[J]. Journal of Oceanography, 2016, 72: 67. DOI:10.1007/s10872-015-0332-2
[36]
POVINEC P P, HIROSE K, AOYAMA M. Radiostrontium in the western North Pacific: Characteristics, behavior, and the Fukushima impact[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(18): 10356.
[37]
BUESSELER K, AOYAMA M, FUKASAWA M. Impacts of the Fukushima nuclear power plants on marine radioactivity[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(23): 9931.
[38]
KAIZER J, KONTUĹ I, POVINEC P P. Impact of the Fukushima accident on 3H and 14C environmental levels: A review of ten years of investigation[J]. Molecules, 2023, 28(6): 2548. DOI:10.3390/molecules28062548
[39]
HAMADA N, OGINO H. Food safety regulations: what we learned from the Fukushima nuclear accident[J]. Journal of environmental radioactivity, 2012, 111: 83. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.08.008
[40]
CASACUBERTA N, MASQUÉ P, GARCIA-ORELLANA J, et al. 90Sr and 89Sr in seawater off Japan as a consequence of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident[J]. Biogeosciences, 2013, 10(6): 3649. DOI:10.5194/bg-10-3649-2013
[41]
DU BOIS P B, LAGUIONIE P, BOUST D, et al. Estimation of marine source-term following Fukushima Daiichi accident[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2012(114): 2.
[42]
POVINEC P P, AOYAMA M, BIDDULPH D, et al. Cesium, iodine and tritium in NW Pacific waters-a comparison of the Fukushima impact with global fallout[J]. Biogeosciences, 2013, 10(8): 5481. DOI:10.5194/bg-10-5481-2013
[43]
TSUMUNE D, TSUBONO T, AOYAMA M, et al. Distribution of oceanic 137Cs from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant simulated numerically by a regional ocean model[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2012, 111: 100. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.10.007
[44]
YANG Baolu, ONDA Y, WAKIYAMA Y, et al. Temporal changes of radiocesium in irrigated paddy fields and its accumulation in rice plants in Fukushima[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 208: 562. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.10.030
[45]
KINTSU H, KODAMA K, HORIGUCHI T. Spatial distributions of and species differences in 90Sr accumulation in marine fishes from the Fukushima coastal region[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2023, 256: 107055. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.107055
[46]
TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings). Nuclide analysis results of fish and shellfish (the ocean area within 20 km radius of Fukushima Daiichi NPS)[EB/OL]. (2012-10-16)[2024-05-24]. https://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/images/handouts_121016_01-e.pdf.
[47]
KADADOU D, SAID E A, AJAJ R, et al. Research advances in nuclear wastewater treatment using conventional and hybrid technologies: Towards sustainable wastewater reuse and recovery[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2023, 52: 103604. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103604
[48]
GUPTA N K, SENGUPTA A, GUPTA A, et al. Biosorption-an alternative method for nuclear waste management: A critical review[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 2159. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2018.03.021
[49]
WANG Jianlong, WAN Zhong. Treatment and disposal of spent radioactive ion-exchange resins produced in the nuclear industry[J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2015, 78: 47. DOI:10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.08.003
[50]
ONDA Y, TANIGUCHI K, YOSHIMURA K, et al. Radionuclides from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in terrestrial systems[J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2020, 1(12): 644.
[51]
ONDA Y, TANIGUCHI K, YOSHIMURA K, et al. Renewed soil erosion and remobilisation of radioactive sediment in Fukushima coastal rivers after the 2013 typhoons[J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4(1): 4574. DOI:10.1038/srep04574
[52]
LACEBY J P, CHARTIN C, EVRARD O, et al. Rainfall erosivity in catchments contaminated with fallout from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2016, 20(6): 2467. DOI:10.5194/hess-20-2467-2016
[53]
WEI Lezhang, KINOUCHI T, VELLEUX M L, et al. Soil erosion and transport simulation and critical erosion area identification in a headwater catchment contaminated by the Fukushima nuclear accident[J]. Journal of Hydro-environment Research, 2017, 17: 18. DOI:10.1016/j.jher.2017.09.003
[54]
NOGRADY B. Is Fukushima wastewater release safe? What the science says[J]. Nature, 2023, 618(7967): 894. DOI:10.1038/d41586-023-02057-y
[55]
BUESSELER K O. Opening the floodgates at Fukushima[J]. Science, 2020, 369(6504): 621. DOI:10.1126/science.abc1507
[56]
EVANGELIOU N, BALKANSKI Y, COZIC A, et al. Global transport and deposition of 137Cs following the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident in Japan: Emphasis on Europe and Asia using high-resolution model versions and radiological impact assessment of the human population and the environment using interactive tools[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(11): 5803.
[57]
KAWAMURA H, KOBAYASHI T, FURUNO A, et al. Preliminary numerical experiments on oceanic dispersion of 131I and 137Cs discharged into the ocean because of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster[J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2011, 48(11): 1349. DOI:10.1080/18811248.2011.9711826
[58]
PERIÁÑEZ R, SUH K S, BYUNG-IL M, et al. Numerical modeling of the releases of 90Sr from Fukushima to the ocean: an evaluation of the source term[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(21): 12305.
[59]
BUESSELER K O, JAYNE S R, FISHER N S, et al. Fukushima-derived radionuclides in the ocean and biota off Japan[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012, 109(16): 5984. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1120794109
[60]
LEHTO J, KOIVULA R, LEINONEN H, et al. Removal of radionuclides from Fukushima Daiichi waste effluents[J]. Separation & Purification Reviews, 2019, 48(2): 122.
[61]
HUANG Lanlan. GT exclusive: Detailed evidence exposes Japan's lies, loopholes in nuclear-contaminated wastewater dumping plan-recipe for disaster[N/OL]. Global Times, (2023-06-05)[2024-05-24]. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202306/1291969.shtml
[62]
World Health Organization. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: Fourth edition incorporating the first and second addenda[R/OL]. (2022-03-21)[2024-05-24]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240045064.
[63]
YAMAGUCHI M, IAEA officials say Fukushima's ongoing release of treated radioactive wastewater is going well[N/OL]. PBS NEWS, 2023-10-23[2024-05-24]. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/iaea-officials-say-fukushimas-ongoing-release-of-treated-radioactive-wastewater-is-going-well.
[64]
TEPCO. Radiation concentration estimates for each tank area (as of September 30, 2023)[R]. Tokyo: Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc., 2023.
[65]
GUO Ji, LIU Yanmin, WU Xianhua, et al. Assessment of the impact of Fukushima nuclear wastewater discharge on the global economy based on GTAP[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2022, 228: 106296.
[66]
WU Xianhua, ZHANG Yi, FENG Xuehao. The impact of Japanese nuclear wastewater discharge into the sea on the global economy: Input-output model approach[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2023, 192: 115067. DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115067
[67]
HANDE V, ORITA M, MATSUNAGA H, et al. Thoughts, perceptions and concerns of coastal residents regarding the discharge of tritium-containing treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean[J]. BMC Public Health, 2023, 23(1): 2436. DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-17349-1
[68]
SMITH J, MARKS N, IRWIN T. The risks of radioactive wastewater release[J]. Science, 2023, 382(6666): 31. DOI:10.1126/science.adi5446
[69]
BENDRISS H, CHAKIR E L M, EL BAKKALI J, et al. InterDosi Monte Carlo study of radiation exposure of a reference crab phantom due to radioactive wastewater deposited in marine environment following the Fukushima nuclear accident[J]. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 2022, 61(4): 623. DOI:10.1007/s00411-022-00994-2
[70]
BATLLE V I J. The potential impact of marine discharges from Fukushima 10 years after the accident[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2022, 18(6): 1530. DOI:10.1002/ieam.4592
[71]
LU Yonglong, YUAN Jingjing, DU Di, et al. Monitoring long-term ecological impacts from release of Fukushima radiation water into ocean[J]. Geography and Sustainability, 2021, 2(2): 95. DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2021.04.002
[72]
CHEGROUCHE S, MELLAH A, BARKAT M. Removal of strontium from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto activated carbon: kinetic and thermodynamic studies[J]. Desalination, 2009, 235(1/3): 306.
[73]
WU F C, TSENG R L. High adsorption capacity NaOH-activated carbon for dye removal from aqueous solution[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 152(3): 1256. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.109
[74]
RAE I B, PAP S, SVOBODOVA D, et al. Comparison of sustainable biosorbents and ion-exchange resins to remove Sr2+ from simulant nuclear wastewater: Batch, dynamic and mechanism studies[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650: 2411. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.396
[75]
KU Young, JUNG Inliang. Photocatalytic reduction of Cr (Ⅵ) in aqueous solutions by UV irradiation with the presence of titanium dioxide[J]. Water Research, 2001, 35(1): 135. DOI:10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00098-1
[76]
WEI Hua, GAO Boqiang, REN Jie, et al. Coagulation/flocculation in dewatering of sludge: A review[J]. Water Research, 2018, 143: 608. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.029
[77]
KIM Y K, KIM S, KIM Y, et al. Facile one-pot synthesis of dual-cation incorporated titanosilicate and its deposition to membrane surfaces for simultaneous removal of Cs+ and Sr2+[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 493: 165. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.008
[78]
ZHAO Yiming, CHENG Lin, WANG Kaiyao, et al. pH-controlled switch over coadsorption and separation for mixed Cs+ and Sr2+ by an acid-resistant potassium thioantimonate[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2022, 32(21): 2112717. DOI:10.1002/adfm.202112717
[79]
OH M, LEE K, JEON M K, et al. Chemical precipitation-based treatment of acidic wastewater generated by chemical decontamination of radioactive concrete[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2023, 11(5): 110306. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2023.110306
[80]
HODKIN D J, STEWART D I, GRAHAM J T, et al. Coprecipitation of 14C and Sr with carbonate precipitates: The importance of reaction kinetics and recrystallization pathways[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016(562): 335.
[81]
SHEN Zhiliang, YAN Guihua, CHEN Gaofeng, et al. Preparation and strontium adsorption behaviors of a new sodium manganese silicate material[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022(290): 120824.
[82]
WANG Xuemei, SHAN Tifeng, PANG Shaojun. Phytoremediation potential of Saccharina japonica and Sargassum horneri (Phaeophyceae): Biosorption study of strontium[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2018, 101: 501. DOI:10.1007/s00128-018-2435-0
[83]
SEO S D, TRUONG-LAM H S, JEON C, et al. Simultaneous removal of multi-nuclide (Sr2+, Co2+, Cs+, and I-) from aquatic environments using a hydrate-based water purification process[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2024, 462: 132700. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132700
[84]
BENGIAT R, BOGOSLAVSKY B, MANDLER D, et al. Selective binding and precipitation of cesium ions from aqueous solutions: A size-driven supramolecular reaction[J]. Chemistry-A European Journal, 2018, 24(13): 3161. DOI:10.1002/chem.201706181
[85]
TOKUNAGA K, KOZAI N, TAKAHASHI Y. A new technique for removing strontium from seawater by coprecipitation with barite[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 359: 307. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.07.044
[86]
WU Liya, ZHANG Guanghui, WANG Quanzhen, et al. Removal of strontium from liquid waste using a hydraulic pellet co-precipitation microfiltration (HPC-MF) process[J]. Desalination, 2014, 349: 31. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2014.06.020
[87]
SINHA P K, LAL K B, AHMED J. Removal of radioiodine from liquid effluents[J]. Waste Management, 1997, 17(1): 33. DOI:10.1016/S0956-053X(97)00034-2
[88]
KRUK M, JARONIEC M, SAYARI A. Adsorption study of surface and structural properties of MCM-41 materials of different pore sizes[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1997, 101(4): 583. DOI:10.1021/jp962000k
[89]
XIA Xu, SHEN Juan, CAO Fang, et al. A facile synthesis of hydroxyapatite for effective removal strontium ion[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 368: 326. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.01.040
[90]
EJAZ S Z H, IQBAL S, SHAHIDA S, et al. Development of titanium doped hydroxyapatite for efficient removal of radioactive strontium from contaminated water[J]. New Journal of Chemistry, 2023, 47(1): 443. DOI:10.1039/D2NJ04860D
[91]
LI Hu, HAN Kexue, SHANG Jinhua, et al. Comparison of adsorption capacity and removal efficiency of strontium by six typical adsorption materials[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(13): 7723. DOI:10.3390/su14137723
[92]
DELKASH M, BAKHSHAYESH B E, KAZEMIAN H. Using zeolitic adsorbents to cleanup special wastewater streams: A review[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2015, 214: 224. DOI:10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.04.039
[93]
SEO S D, TRUONG-LAM H S, JEON C, et al. Simultaneous removal of multi-nuclide (Sr2+, Co2+, Cs+, and I-) from aquatic environments using a hydrate-based water purification process[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2024, 462: 132700. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132700
[94]
FISKUM S K, PEASE L F, PETERSON R A. Review of ion exchange technologies for cesium removal from caustic tank waste[J]. Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange, 2020, 38(6): 573. DOI:10.1080/07366299.2020.1780688
[95]
ZHANG Lan, WEI Jiying, ZHAO Xuan, et al. Competitive adsorption of strontium and cobalt onto tin antimonate[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 285: 679. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.013
[96]
WANG Shuai, LIANG Shanshan. Acid response nanochannels of graphene oxide membranes for fast nuclide ions separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2024, 328: 125086. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125086
[97]
VISHWAKARMA R K, NARAYANAM P K, UMAMAHESWARI R, et al. Amino-functionalized graphene oxide membranes for efficient separation of Sr2+ ions[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2023, 51: 103329. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103329
[98]
CHENG Junye, LIU Kaili, LI Xin, et al. Nickel-metal-organic framework nanobelt based composite membranes for efficient Sr2+ removal from aqueous solution[J]. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 2020, 3: 100035. DOI:10.1016/j.ese.2020.100035
[99]
KIM H J, KIM S J, HYEON S, et al. Application of desalination membranes to nuclide (Cs, Sr, and Co) separation[J]. ACS omega, 2020, 5(32): 20261. DOI:10.1021/acsomega.0c02106
[100]
ESSALHI M, ISMAIL N, TESFALIDET S, et al. Polyvinylidene fluoride membrane formation using carbon dioxide as a non-solvent additive for nuclear wastewater decontamination[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 446: 137300. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2022.137300
[101]
ZHU Jiaying, CHENG Lin, ZHAO Yi. Ming, et al. Structural investigation of the efficient capture of Cs+ and Sr2+ by a microporous Cd-Sn-Se ion exchanger constructed from mono-lacunary supertetrahedral clusters[J]. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers, 2022, 9(12): 2880. DOI:10.1039/D2QI00338D
[102]
LI Weian, PENG Yingchen, MA Wen, et al. Rapid and selective removal of Cs+ and Sr2+ ions by two zeolite-type sulfides via ion exchange method[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 442: 136377. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2022.136377
[103]
BORAI E H, HARJULA R, PAAJANEN A. Efficient removal of cesium from low-level radioactive liquid waste using natural and impregnated zeolite minerals[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 172(1): 416. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.033
[104]
BEHRENS E A, SYLVESTER P, CLEARFIELD A. Assessment of a sodium nonatitanate and pharmacosiderite-type ion exchangers for strontium and cesium removal from DOE waste simulants[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1998, 32(1): 101.
[105]
AMESH P, SUNEESH A S, VENKATESAN K A, et al. Preparation and ion exchange studies of cesium and strontium on sodium iron titanate[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 238: 116393. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116393
[106]
CUNNINGHAM S D, SHANN J R, CROWLEY D E, et al. Phytoremediation of contaminated water and soil[M]. Washington, DC.: American Chemical Society, 1997: 2.
[107]
YAN Lijun, VAN LE Q, SONNE C, et al. Phytoremediation of radionuclides in soil, sediments and water[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 407: 124771. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124771
[108]
KANG S M, JANG S C, HEO N S, et al. Cesium-induced inhibition of bacterial growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and their possible potential applications for bioremediation of wastewater[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 338: 323. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.050
[109]
MEHTA N, BENZERARA K, KOCAR B D, et al. Sequestration of radionuclides radium-226 and strontium-90 by cyanobacteria forming intracellular calcium carbonates[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(21): 12639.
[110]
MISHRA S, SAHOO S K, BOSSEW P, et al. Vertical migration of radio-caesium derived from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in undisturbed soils of grassland and forest[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2016, 169: 163. DOI:10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.07.023
[111]
[112]
ZEZIN A B, MIKHEIKIN S V, ROGACHEVA V B, et al. Polymeric stabilizers for protection of soil and ground against wind and water erosion[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2015, 226: 17. DOI:10.1016/j.cis.2015.06.006
[113]
WAN Yong, HUI Xinminnan, HE Xingxing, et al. Utilization of flue gas desulfurization gypsum to produce green binder for dredged soil solidification: Strength, durability, and planting performance[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 367: 133076. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133076
[114]
LEE H K, JUN B M, KIM S I, et al. Simultaneous removal of suspended fine soil particles, strontium and cesium from soil washing effluent using inorganic flocculants[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2022, 27: 102467.
[115]
SONG H, CHUNG H, NAM K. Effect of monovalent and divalent ion solutions as washing agents on the removal of Sr and Cs from soil near a nuclear power plant[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 412: 125165. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125165
[116]
CHEN Liyuan, NAKAMURA K, HAMA T. Review on stabilization/solidification methods and mechanism of heavy metals based on OPC-based binders[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 332: 117362. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117362
[117]
FELDSTEIN M M, DORMIDONTOVA E E, KHOKHLOV A R. Pressure sensitive adhesives based on interpolymer complexes[J]. Progress in Polymer Science, 2015, 42: 79. DOI:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.10.006
[118]
AMMAR A, NOUIRA A, EL MOURIDI Z, et al. Recent trends in the phytoremediation of radionuclide contamination of soil by cesium and strontium: Sources, mechanisms and methods: A comprehensive review[J]. Chemosphere, 2024, 142273.
[119]
PURKIS J M, BARDOS R P, GRAHAM J, et al. Developing field-scale, gentle remediation options for nuclear sites contaminated with 137Cs and 90Sr: The role of nature-based solutions[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 308: 114620. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114620
[120]
BURGER A, WEIDINGER M, ADLASSNIG W, et al. Response of Arabidopsis halleri to cesium and strontium in hydroponics: Extraction potential and effects on morphology and physiology[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2019, 184: 109625. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109625
[121]
SINGH B S M, DHAL N K, KUMAR M, et al. Retaliation of Alstonia scholaris (L.) R. Br. to caesium and strontium in hydroponics: Effect on morpho-physiology and induction of enzymatic defence[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2023, 195(6): 703. DOI:10.1007/s10661-023-11304-8
[122]
KONOPLEV A, KANIVETS V, ZHUKOVA, et al. Mid-to long-term radiocesium wash-off from contaminated catchments at Chernobyl and Fukushima[J]. Water Research, 2021, 188: 116514. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116514
[123]
PANIN A V, WALLING D E, GOLOSOV V N. The role of soil erosion and fluvial processes in the post-fallout redistribution of Chernobyl-derived caesium-137:A case study of the Lapki catchment, Central Russia[J]. Geomorphology, 2001, 40(3/4): 185.
[124]
TANIGUCHI K, ONDA Y, SMITH H G, et al. Transport and redistribution of radiocesium in Fukushima fallout through rivers[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(21): 12339.
[125]
YOSHIMURA K, ONDA Y, SAKAGUCHI A, et al. An extensive study of the concentrations of particulate/dissolved radiocaesium derived from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in various river systems and their relationship with catchment inventory[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 139: 370. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.08.021
[126]
YAMASHIKI Y, ONDA Y, SMITH H G, et al. Initial flux of sediment-associated radiocesium to the ocean from the largest river impacted by Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant[J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4(1): 3714. DOI:10.1038/srep03714
[127]
BO A, SARINA S, ZHENG Zhanfeng, et al. Removal of radioactive iodine from water using Ag2O grafted titanate nanolamina as efficient adsorbent[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 246: 199.
[128]
HAMED M M, HOLIEL M, EL-ARYAN Y F. Removal of selenium and iodine radionuclides from waste solutions using synthetic inorganic ion exchanger[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2017, 242: 722. DOI:10.1016/j.molliq.2017.07.035
[129]
LU Taotao, ZHU Yongfeng, WANG Wenbo, et al. Interconnected superporous adsorbent prepared via yeast-based Pickering HIPEs for high-efficiency adsorption of Rb+, Cs+ and Sr2+[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 361: 1411. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.006
[130]
PRAJITNO M Y, HARBOTTLE D, HONDOW N, et al. The effect of pre-activation and milling on improving natural clinoptilolite for ion exchange of cesium and strontium[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8(1): 102991. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2019.102991
[131]
YE Zhaoyong, ZHANG Ying, HOU Lian, et al. Preparation of a GO/PB-modified nanofiltration membrane for removal of radioactive cesium and strontium from water[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 446: 137143. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2022.137143
[132]
LIU Xiaojing, WU Jinling, WANG Jianlong. Removal of Cs (Ⅰ) from simulated radioactive wastewater by three forward osmosis membranes[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 344: 353. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.046
[133]
COMBERNOUX N, SCHRIVE L, LABED V, et al. Treatment of radioactive liquid effluents by reverse osmosis membranes: From lab-scale to pilot-scale[J]. Water research, 2017, 123: 311. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.062
[134]
COMBERNOUX N, SCHRIVE L, LABED V, et al. Polyethersulfone Blended with Titanium Dioxide Nanoribbons/Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes for Strontium Removal from Water[J]. Polymers, 2022, 14(7): 1390. DOI:10.3390/polym14071390
[135]
ALI S, SHAH I A, HUANG H. Selectivity of Ar/O2 plasma-treated carbon nanotube membranes for Sr (Ⅱ) and Cs(Ⅰ) in water and wastewater: Fit-for-purpose water treatment[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 237: 116352. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116352
[136]
TORRES E, GÓMEZ P. The handbook of environmental remediation: Classic and modern techniques-chapter 7: Permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) for environmental site remediation[M/OL]. London: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2020: 191[2024-05-14]. https://books.rsc.org/books/edited-volume/787/The-Handbook-of-Envir-onmental-Remediation-Classic.
[137]
HEMMING S D, PURKIS J M, WARWICK P E, et al. Current and emerging technologies for the remediation of difficult-to-measure radionuclides at nuclear sites[J]. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 2023, 25: 1909.
[138]
CHAPLIN J D, BERILLO D, PURKIS J M, et al. Effective 137Cs+ and 90Sr2+immobilisation from groundwater by inorganic polymer resin Clevasol® embedded within a macroporouscryogel host matrix[J]. Materials Today Sustainability, 2022, 19: 100190. DOI:10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100190
[139]
FENG Bin, ONDA Y, WAKIYAMA Y, et al. Persistent impact of Fukushima decontamination on soil erosion and suspended sediment[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2022, 5(10): 879. DOI:10.1038/s41893-022-00924-6
[140]
SAIDIN Z H, LEVIA D F, KATO H, et al. Vertical distribution and transport of radiocesium via branchflow and stemflow through the canopy of cedar and oak stands in the aftermath of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 818: 151698. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151698
[141]
SINGH S, THORAT V, KAUSHIK C P, et al. Potential of Chromolaena odorata for phytoremediation of 137Cs from solution and low level nuclear waste[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 162(2/3): 743.
[142]
MOOGOUEI R, BORGHEI M, ARJMANDI R. Phytoremediation of stable Cs from solutions by Calendula alata, Amaranthus chlorostachys and Chenopodium album[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2011, 74(7): 2036. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.07.019
[143]
TAYLOR P A. Physical, chemical, and biological treatment of groundwater at contaminated nuclear and NORM sites[M]//Environmental Remediation and Restoration of Contaminated Nuclear and Norm Sites. Woodhead Publishing, 2015: 237.
[144]
SAKR M, EL AGAMAWI H, KLAMMLER H, et al. A review on the use of permeable reactive barriers as an effective technique for groundwater remediation[J]. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 2023, 21: 100914. DOI:10.1016/j.gsd.2023.100914
[145]
KITAMURA A, YAMAGUCHI M, KURIKAMI H, et al. Predicting sediment and cesium-137 discharge from catchments in eastern Fukushima[J]. Anthropocene, 2014, 5: 22. DOI:10.1016/j.ancene.2014.07.001
[146]
CASTRILLEJO M, CASACUBERTA N, BREIER C F, et al. Reassessment of 90Sr, 137Cs, and 134Cs in the coast off Japan derived from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(1): 173. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2016.01.048
[147]
GALLARDO A H, MARUI A. The aftermath of the Fukushima nuclear accident: Measures to contain groundwater contamination[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 547: 261. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.129
[148]
CHANDLER K R, STEVENS C J, BINLEY A, et al. Influence of tree species and forest land use on soil hydraulic conductivity and implications for surface runoff generation[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 310: 120. DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.08.011
[149]
NISHIKIORI T, WATANABE M, KOSHIKAWA M K, et al. Uptake and translocation of radiocesium in cedar leaves following the Fukushima nuclear accident[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 502: 611. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.063
[150]
BIAN Fangyuan, ZHANG Xiaoping, ZHONG Zheke, et al. Introducing sedum affects root-soil interface phytoremediation of heavy metals in lei bamboo forest and potential risks from edible bamboo shoots[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2023, 34(6): 1820.
[151]
NAKAO A, OGASAWARA S, SANO O, et al. Radiocesium sorption in relation to clay mineralogy of paddy soils in Fukushima, Japan[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 468: 523.
[152]
YIN Xiangbiao, HORIUCHI N, UTSUNOMIYA S, et al. Effective and efficient desorption of Cs from hydrothermal-treated clay minerals for the decontamination of Fukushima radioactive soil[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 333: 392. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.199
[153]
LEPAGE H, LACEBY J P, BONTÉ P, et al. Investigating the source of radiocesiumcontaminated sediment in two Fukushima coastal catchments with sediment tracing techniques[J]. Anthropocene, 2016, 13: 57. DOI:10.1016/j.ancene.2016.01.004
[154]
KUMAR P B A N, DUSHENKOV V, MOTTO H, et al. Phytoextraction: The use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1995, 29(5): 1232.
[155]
EAPEN S, SINGH S, THORAT V, et al. Phytoremediation of radiostrontium (90Sr) and radiocesium (137Cs) using giant milky weed (Calotropis gigantea R. Br.) plants[J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 65(11): 2071. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.049
[156]
CHU Qingnan, WATANABE T, SHA Zhimin, et al. Interactions between Cs, Sr, and other nutrients and trace element accumulation in Amaranthus shoot in response to variety effect[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2015, 63(8): 2355. DOI:10.1021/jf5058777
[157]
SINGH S, EAPEN S, THORAT V, et al. Phytoremediation of 137cesium and 90strontium from solutions and low-level nuclear waste by Vetiveria zizanoides[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2008, 69(2): 306. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.12.004
[158]
JALALI J, GAUDIN P, AMMAR E, et al. Bioaugmentation coupled with phytoextraction for the treatment of Cd and Sr, and reuse opportunities for phosphogypsum rare earth elements[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 399: 122821. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122821
[159]
KOBAYASHI D, OKOUCHI T, YAMAGAMI M, et al. Verification of radiocesium decontamination from farmlands by plants in Fukushima[J]. Journal of Plant Research, 2014, 127: 51. DOI:10.1007/s10265-013-0607-x
[160]
KOBAYASHI D, OKOUCHI T, YAMAGAMI M, et al. Response of Plantago major to cesium and strontium in hydroponics: Absorption and effects on morphology, physiology and photosynthesis[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2019, 254: 113084. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113084
[161]
ROMEH A A, SABER R A I. Green nano-phytoremediation and solubility improving agents for the remediation of chlorfenapyr contaminated soil and water[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 260: 110104. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110104
[162]
HOLLAND J M. The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: Reviewing the evidence[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2004, 103(1): 1.
[163]
HOSHINO Y, HIGASHI T, ITO T, et al. Tillage can reduce the radiocesium contamination of soybean after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2015, 153: 76. DOI:10.1016/j.still.2015.05.005
[164]
LI P, GONG Yingting, KOMATSUZAKI M. Temporal dynamics of 137Cs distribution in soil and soil-to-crop transfer factor under different tillage systems after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in Japan[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 697: 134060. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134060
[165]
COOPER R J, HAMA-AZIZ Z Q, HISCOCK K M, et al. Conservation tillage and soil health: Lessons from a 5-year UK farm trial (2013—2018)[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 202: 104648. DOI:10.1016/j.still.2020.104648
Fig. 1 Distribution of operational nuclear power plants in the world
Fig. 2 Numbers of nuclear reactors in USA, France, China, Russia, Japan and the UK (in use and under construction) till 2022. Source from Radiation concentration estimates for each tank area
Fig. 3 Nuclear energy consumption of USA, France, Japan, UK, Russia and China during 2000 to 2022
Fig. 4 Nuclear power capacities of USA, France, China, Russia, Japan and the UK (in use and under construction) till 2022
Tab. 1 Concentrations of Cs and Sr in environment near historical nuclear accidents
Fig. 5 Potentially affected areas by the Fukushima accident
Fig. 6 Nuclear energy consumption percentage in Japan during year 1965 to 2022
Source from: Radiation concentration estimates for each tank area (as of September 30, 2023) Fig. 7 Percentage of high-concentration tanks in five main areas
Source from https://www.tepco.co.jp/en/decommission/progress/treated-water-lan/index-e.html Fig. 8 Schematic display of Japan's Nuclear wastewater storage and discharge
Tab. 2 Comparison of different nuclear wastewater treatment technologies
Fig. 9 Schematic display of efficient treatment technology for radioactive Sr and Cs containing nuclear wastewater
Fig. 10 Four main nuclear wastewater treatment technologies (absorption and ion exchange)
Tab. 3 Comparison of different soil and water conservation technologies
Fig. 11 The PRS technology in underground water treatment
Review of wastewater treatment technologies, soil and water conservation measures in nuclear power plants, and...
WANG Chu, NIU Jianzhi, LUN Xiaoxiu, ZHANG Linus, BERNDTSSON Ronny