Improved Five-Parameter Exponential-Type Potential Energy Model for Diatomic Molecules
Fu Ke-Xue1, Wang Meng2, Jia Chun-Sheng3, †
Chengdu Shishi High School, Chengdu 610000, China
2 Xindu No.1 Middle School, Chengdu 610500, China
3 State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: chshjia@263.net

Abstract
Abstract

The dissociation energy and equilibrium bond length as explicit parameters are used to establish an improved five-parameter exponential-type potential energy model for diatomic molecules. We demonstrate that the five-parameter exponential-type potential is identical to the Tietz potential for diatomic molecules. It is observed that the improved five-parameter exponential-type potential can well model the internuclear interaction potential energy curve for the ground electronic state of the carbon monoxide molecule by the utilization of the experimental values of three molecular constants.

1 Introduction

The knowledge of internuclear interaction potential energy between two atoms as a function of their relative positions is of fundamental importance in a wide variety of fields. There has been a growing interest in obtaining an available closed-form representation governing the interaction of two atoms for diatomic molecules in chemistry and physics. Numerous contributions have been made to build analytical internuclear potential energy functions.[115] In recent years, by utilizing the dissociation energy and equilibrium bond length for a diatomic molecule as explicit parameters, some authors[1621] constructed improved versions with more convenient applications for some empirical potential energy functions, including the well-known Rosen-Morse, Tietz, Frost-Musulin, Manning-Rosen, and Pöschl-Teller potentials. The improved molecular potentials have received considerable attentions due to their real applications in many fields, including simulations of molecular potential curves, predictions of thermochemical quantities of gaseous substances, and calculations of molecular vibrational energies.[2150] There has been an increasing recognition of the importance of the Tietz potential as a typical potential energy model. Hassanabadi et al.[5153] studied the solutions of the Dirac equation and Klein-Gordon equation with the Tietz potential in terms of the supersymmetry quantum mechanics approach. Ikot et al.[54] investigated the bound state solutions of the Duffin-Kemmer-Petiau equation with the Tietz potential by employing the Nikiforov-Uvarov method. Onate et al.[55] computed the Shannon entropy and information energy under the modified Tietz-Hua potential. Khordad and Mirhosseini[56] studied the optical properties of spherical quantum dots by using the Tietz potential.

In 2001, the authors in the literature[12] proposed a five-parameter exponential-type potential model, and obtained a general energy spectrum formula by solving the Schrödinger equation with that in terms of the supersymmetry shape invariance approach. By choosing suitable forms of the parameters, the five-parameter exponential-type potential can turn to some well-known potential functions, including the Hulthén potential, Eckart potential, and improved Manning-Rosen potential. It is unfortunate that the model parameters in the five-parameter exponential-type potential lack explicit physical definitions. This fault has greatly affected its effective applications. In this work, we attempt to establish an improved five-parameter exponential-type potential energy model for diatomic molecules, and explore the relationship between it and the well-known Tietz potential in the presence of a diatomic molecule. We also apply the improved five-parameter exponential-type potential to model the internuclear interaction potential curve for the ground electronic state of the carbon monoxide (CO) molecule. A great deal of CO is released from tail gases, including coke oven gas, carbon black manufacturing tail gas, etc. CO is one of the most prominent gaseous environment pollutants, and a highly toxic gas for humans as well as for animals. Due to its high harmful effect on human health, the adsorption processes of CO in various adsorbent materials have aroused considerable attention.[5761]

2 Improved Five-Parameter Exponential-Type Potential Energy Model

The five-parameter exponential-type potential energy model can be represented as Eq. (1),[12] 1
where P1, P2, P3, q, and α are five adjustable parameters, and .

For a diatomic molecular potential energy function U(r), it is directly related to the three molecular constants and satisfies the following three relationships:


where De denotes the dissociation energy for a diatomic molecule, re is the equilibrium bond length, ωe represents the equilibrium harmonic vibrational frequency, μ is the reduced mass of the molecule, and c is the speed of light. Taking the first order derivate of U(r) with respect to the r variable and substituting it into Eq. (2), we obtain
From Eq. (5), we have the following expression,
With the help of expression (6), we obtain the following relationship from Eq. (3),
Solving Eqs. (6) and (7) for parameters P2 and P3 yields the following two expressions,

Substituting expressions (8) and (9) into Eq. (1) and making simple algebraic manipulations, we can rewrite potential function (1) in the following form
In order to achieve a choice that the minimum value of the potential energy is zero, i.e. , an additional term of is added to the right hand of expression (10). This manipulation does not produce any change in the physical properties of the original potential energy function. The five-parameter exponential-type potential function can be further represented as the following form
here we have replaced α by α/2 for the sake of simplification. The improved five-parameter exponential-type potential given in the above expression is just the improved Tietz potential.[16] Therefore, the five-parameter exponential-type potential is identical to the Tietz potential for diatomic molecules. Employing the improved Tietz potential to represent the internal vibration of a molecule, the molar entropy values have been satisfactorily predicted for gaseous substances, including the gases CO, HCl, HF, DF, NO, and gaseous BBr.[30] Choosing q = 0, the improved five-parameter exponential-type potential becomes the standard Morse potential.[1] When q = 1 and q = −1, the improved five-parameter exponential-type potential turns to the standard improved Rosen-Morse potential[16] and improved Manning-Rosen potential.[18]

We calculate the second order derivation of U(r) given in expression (11) with respect to r, and substitute it into Eq. (4). In the presence of given parameter q, we solve Eq. (5) for parameter α and achieve the following expression,
in which W represents the Lambert W function, which satisfies .[62]

3 Applications

By choosing an available value of parameter q and putting the experimental values of the molecular constants De, re, and ωe as inputs, we reproduce the potential energy curve for the ground electronic state of CO in terms of the improved five-parameter exponential-type potential. The experimental values of three molecular constants are obtained by referring to the literature:[13] , , and . Substituting these values into expression (12) and taking q = −0.55, we obtain the value of parameter α as α=2.191 89 Å−1. The variation of internuclear interaction potential with internuclear distance is shown in Fig. 1, in which the green solid line stands for the predicted values and red solid circles represent the experimental Rydberg-Klein-Rees (RKR )[6365] data points from the literature.[66] Figure 1 shows that the predicted potential energy values are in excellent agreement with the experimental RKR potential data points over the entire interaction distance range except at much large r.

Fig. 1. Experimental RKR data points and the improved five-parameter exponential-type potential energy curve for the ground electronic state of CO.

In order to evaluate quantificationally the accuracy of the proposed potential, we consider the average absolute deviation of the improved five-parameter exponential-type potential versus the experimental RKR potential. The average absolute deviation is represented as , here Np denotes the number of experimental data points considered in the RKR potential, URKR(r and Ucalc(r) represent the experimental RKR potential and the empirical analytical potential, respectively. The average deviation of the improved five-parameter exponential-type potential versus the RKR potential reported by Kirschner, and Watson[66] is 0.333% of De. This average absolute deviation satisfies satisfactorily the Lippincottʼs error criterion for an available empirical closed-form potential energy representation. The Lippincottʼs error criterion implies that an average absolute deviation should be less than 1% of the dissociation energy for a successful analytical energy function.[10]

4 Conclusion

Through the introduction of the dissociation energy and equilibrium bond length as explicit parameters, we establish the improved five-parameter exponential-type potential model for diatomic molecules. We show exactly and simply that the five-parameter exponential-type potential is identical to the Tietz potential in the presence of a diatomic molecule. Using the experimental values of the dissociation energy, equilibrium bond length and equilibrium harmonic vibrational frequency, we model satisfactorily the potential energy curve for the ground electronic state of CO. By the calculation of average absolute deviation of the proposed potential versus the experimental RKR potential, we show quantitatively that the improved five-parameter exponential-type potential is an available model to represent the internuclear interaction potential for the ground electronic state of the CO molecule.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the kind referee for positive and invaluable suggestions which have greatly improved the manuscript.

Reference
[1] Morse P. M. Phys. Rev. 34 1929 57
[2] Rosen N. Morse P. M. Phys. Rev. 42 1932 210
[3] Manning M. F. Rosen N. Phys. Rev. 44 1933 951
[4] Pöschl G. Teller E. Z. Physik 83 1933 143
[5] Deng Z. H. Fan Y. P. Shandong Univ. J. 7 1957 162
[6] Tietz T. J. Chem. Phys. 38 1963 3036
[7] Murrell J. N. Sorbie K. S. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday T2 70 1974 1552
[8] Schiöberg D. Mol. Phys. 59 1986 1123
[9] Wei H. Phys. Rev. A 42 1990 2524
[10] Zavitsas A. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113 1991 4755
[11] Eğrifes H. Demirhan D. Büyükkılıç F. Phys. Lett. A 275 2000 229
[12] Jia C. S. Zhang Y. Zeng X. L. Sun L. T. Commun. Theor. Phys. 36 2001 641
[13] Hajigeorgiou P. G. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 263 2010 101
[14] Xie R. H. Gong J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 2005 263202
[15] Xie J. C. Kar T. Xie R. H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 591 2014 69
[16] Jia C. S. Diao Y. F. Liu X. J. et al. J. Chem. Phys. 137 2012 014101
[17] Zhang G. D. Liu J. Y. Zhang L. H. et al. Phys. Rev. A 86 2012 062510
[18] Wang P. Q. Zhang L. H. Jia C. S. et al. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 274 2012 5
[19] Liang G. C. Tang H. M. Jia C. S. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1020 2013 170
[20] Jia C. S. Zhang L. H. Peng X. L. Int. J. Quantum. Chem. 117 2017 e25383
[21] Hu X. T. Liu J. Y. Jia C. S. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1019 2013 137
[22] Ferreira F. J. S. Prudente F. V. Phys. Lett. A 377 2013 3027
[23] Yanar H. Aydoğdu O. Saltı M. Mol. Phys. 114 2016 3134
[24] Ovando G. Peña J. J. Morales J. Theor. Chem. Acc. 135 2016 62
[25] Mustafa O. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 48 2015 065101
[26] Jia C. S. Zhang L. H. Wang C. W. Chem. Phys. Lett. 667 2017 211
[27] Song X. Q. Wang C. W. Jia C. S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 673 2017 50
[28] Jia C. S. Wang C. W. Zhang L. H. et al. Chem. Phys. Lett. 676 2017 150
[29] Wang J. F. Peng X. L. Zhang L. H. et al. Chem. Phys. Lett. 686 2017 131
[30] Jia C. S. Wang C. W. Zhang L. H. et al. Chem. Phys. Lett. 692 2018 57
[31] Buchowiecki M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 687 2017 227
[32] Buchowiecki M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 692 2018 236
[33] Jia C. S. Wang C. W. Zhang L. H. et al. Chem. Eng. Sci. 183 2018 26
[34] Jia C. S. Zeng R. Peng X. L. et al. Chem. Eng. Sci. 190 2018 1
[35] Peng X. L. Jiang R. Jia C. S. et al. Chem. Eng. Sci. 190 2018 122
[36] Deng M. Jia C. S. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133 2018 258
[37] Aguda E. V. Can. J. Phys. 91 2013 689
[38] Adepoju A. G. Eweh E. J. Can. J. Phys. 92 2014 18
[39] Pe na J. J. García-Martínez J. García-Ravelo J. Morales J. Int. J. Quantum. Chem. 115 2015 158
[40] Akanni Y. W. Kazeem I. Chin. J. Phys. 53 2015 060401
[41] Amrouche A. Diaf A. Hachama M. Can. J. Phys. 95 2017 25
[42] Feizi H. Ranjbar A. H. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 128 2013 3
[43] Ikot A. N. Hassanabadi H. Obong H. P. et al. Chin. Phys. B 23 2014 120303
[44] Onate C. A. Onyeaju M. C. Ikot A. N. Ann. Phys. 375 2016 239
[45] Chen W. L. Shi Y. W. Wei G. F. Commun. Theor. Phys. 66 2016 196
[46] Tas A. Aydogdu O. Salti M. Ann. Phys. 379 2017 67
[47] Ocak Z. Yanar H. Salti M. Aydogdu O. Chem. Phys. 513 2018 252
[48] Jia C. S. Dai J. W. Zhang L. H. et al. Phys. Lett. A 379 2015 137
[49] Jia C. S. Dai J. W. Zhang L. H. et al. Chem. Phys. Lett. 619 2015 54
[50] Jia C. S. He T. Shui Z. W. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1108 2017 57
[51] Hassanabadi H. Maghsoodi E. Zarrinkamar S. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 31 2012 127
[52] Ikot A. N. Hassanabadi H. Maghsoodi E. Zarrinkamar S. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 11 2014 432
[53] Lu L. L. Yazarloo B. H. Zarrinkamar S. et al. Few-Body Syst. 53 2012 573
[54] Ikot A. N. Molaee Z. Maghsoodi E. et al. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 12 2015 275
[55] Onate C. A. Onyeaju M. C. Ituen E. E. Indian J. Phys. 92 2018 487
[56] Khordad R. Mirhosseini B. Pramana J. Phys. 85 2015 723
[57] Ma S. H. Jiao Z. Y. Zhang X. Z. Dai X. Q. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1009 2013 55
[58] Shariati S. Pakiari A. H. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1099 2017 92
[59] Limon P. Miralrio A. Castro M. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1129 2018 37
[60] Raj K. A R. Chan S. H. Electrochim. Acta 165 2015 288
[61] Matsuda Y. Shimizu T. Mitsushima S. J. Power Sources 318 2016 1
[62] Corless R. M. Gonnet G. H. Hare D. E. G. et al. Adv. Comput. Math. 5 1996 329
[63] Rydberg R. Z. Phys. 80 1933 514
[64] Klein O. Z. Phys. 76 1932 226
[65] Rees A. L G. Proc. Phys. Soc. 59 1947 998
[66] Kirschner S. M. Watson J. K G. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 51 1974 321