Cylindrical Three-Dimensional Dust-Ion Acoustic Propagation in Plasmas
El-Labany S. K.1, El-Shewy E. K.2, 3, *, Abd El-Razek H. N.1, 2, El-Rahman A. A.4
Theoretical Physics Group, Faculty of Science, Domietta University, Domietta, Egypt
Department of Physics, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarrah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Theoretical Physics Group, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, New Valley Branch, New Valley, Egypt

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: eattiaelshewy@taibahu.edu.sa emadshewy@yahoo.com

Abstract
Abstract

Wave properties of solitons in an unmagnetized four-component dusty plasma system contains isothermal distributed electrons, mobile ions, and negative-positive dusty grains have been examined. To study DIA wave properties, a reductive perturbation (RP) analysis is used. By a reductive perturbation (RP) analysis under convenient coordinate transformation, the three dimension Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in cylindrical coordinates is obtained. The effects of dust grain charge on soliton pulse structures are studied. More specifically, solitary profile depending on the axial, radial, and polar angle coordinates with time is discussed. This investigation may be viable in plasmas of the Earth’s mesosphere.

1 Introduction

No doubt, studying of nonlinear waves and their structures in plasmas with charged dust grains is one of important activities during the last few decades for explaining many systems in astrophysics (Earth magnetosphere, cometary tails, nebulas, mesosphere),[14] as well as in the laboratory.[56] Moreover, it has remarkable applications in fiber optics, plasmas of semiconductor, and dust-crystals.[79] The charged grains in plasmas change plasma features, and define new types of wave phenomena.[1013] Many investigations are made to expound the applications of nonlinear properties in astrophysics and space dust plasmas.[1416] It has been reported that dusty grains in multicomponent plasmas influenced the collective interactions in plasmas[17] and the variation of dust charge modified shock features.[1820] Many articles discussed the negative dusty plasma applications in space.[2122] On the other hand, in other studies, both negative-positive grains are taken into account in space plasma[2324] and in plasma laboratories.[25] On the other hand, a new dust grain model has been approached for cometary plasmas having opposite charges polarity in the depletion of electrons and ions.[26] Later, plasma containing ions, electrons, grains with positively-negatively charged was inspected.[27] It was investigated that, new positively grain component caused the existence of twofold solitary potentials. Furthermore, shock behavior in inhomogeneous plasmas with ionizing source is examined.[28] They reported that, charge polarity fluctuation of dusty charge improved the monotonic characteristics of shock waves. However, many of these studies are regarded to the unbounded planar geometry. This is not true for space and laboratory plasma. So we have taken the non-planar form of cylindrical geometry into account. Several theoretical studies in non-planar geometry on the dust plasmas features have been deliberated.[2932] A multidimensional cylindrical form of Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation (CKP) in dusty plasmas with two superthermality distributed temperature ions has been introduced.[32] Finally, El-Bedwehy et al. investigated CKP equation in a plasma of two charged dust grains.[33] They examined features of soliton formation that depends on with the polar, radial and axial coordinates.

Our article is to explore the non-planar (cylindrical) three-dimensional DIAWs in four components dust plasma system contains isothermal electrons, mobile ions and negative-positive dust grains. We study the effects of ion to electron number density ratio, negative dust grain to electron density ratio and positive grain with an electron number density ratio on nonlinear wave phase speed as well as on the pulse width and amplitude. In addition, the effect of non-planar geometry on the pulse profile is studied. The organization of this paper is as follows. In Sec. 2, we present model equations. In Sec. 3, the derivation of CKP equation is present. Its solution is given in Sec. 4. Section 5 is devoted for results and discussion.

2 System of Equations

Consider a three-dimensional, unmagnetized dusty plasma system whose constituents is isothermal distributed electrons, mobile ions, negative and positive dusty grains. The three-dimensional continuity equations for mobile components are given by

The corresponding momentum equations are,

These equations are supplemented by Poisson’s equation:

In the above equations nj (j = i,n,p,e) are the perturbed number densities and ni0, nn0, np0, and ne0 are the related equilibrium values. Also uj (j = i,n,p) are the ion, negative and positive dusty plasma velocities, respectively, normalized by the ion sound velocity (KBTe/mi)1/2, ϕ is the electrostatic potential and normalized by (KBTe/e), time variable t and space coordinate are normalized by inverse of the plasma frequency and electron Debye length λd = (KBTe/4π e2ne0)1/2, respectively, μ = Znmi/mn, α = Zpmi/mp, Here, KB and Te are Boltzmann constant and temperature of electron, e the electronic charge, mj (j = i,n,p) denote ion, negative and positive dust masses respectively.

From the charge neutrality condition, we have

with

where Zn and Zp are charge numbers of negative and positive grains, respectively.

3 Nonlinear Calculations

To study DIA wave properties, a reductive perturbation (RP) analysis is used.[34] We introduce the new independent variables:[3536]

where ϵ is a small parameter measures the degree of perturbation and the λ is the wave propagation velocity. The dependent variables in the model are expanded in the powers of ϵ as

where uj, vj, and wj are the ion, negative and positive dust velocities in R, Θ, and Z directions, respectively. Substituting Eqs. (5) and (6) to Eqs. (1)–(3), the first-order in ϵ for ion are

whereas for negative dust are given by

and for positive dust are given by

Poisson equation leads to the compatibility condition:

At the next order in ε, the evolution equation for the first order perturbed electrostatic potential in the form

The nonlinear and the dispersion coefficients A and B are given by

Equation (11) is a 3D-CKP equation for dust-ion acoustic waves. If we neglect Z and Θ dependence, Eq. (11) is reduced to KdV equation.

4 3D-CKP Solution

In order to solve Eq. (11), the generalized expansion method is used.[37] According to the transformation

the exact solution of Eq. (11) is given by[3132,37]

where, the amplitude ϕ0 and the width Δ are given by

with

while Lr and Lz are the direction cosines in R and Z axes, with condition and U0 is an arbitrary constant. Also note that the product is independent of U0 but depends on λ.

5 Results and Discussion

To carry out this study, many conditions are introduced (i) for model components, our assumption is isothermal electrons and cold fluid of ions and dust grains[38] (ii) the gravitational effect is neglected for submicron dusty grains[3839] (iii) the plasma is of low coupling parameter (iv) inter-grain distance is very small. By applying reductive perturbation theory, introduced by Taniuti and Wei (1968),[34] this plasma model leads to a 3D-CKP equation (11). Now we discuss effects of system parameters on the feature of dust ion acoustic soliton solution using mesospheric parameters.[4043] The dependence of solitons features i.e. wave phase velocity λ, soliton amplitude and width ϕ0 and Δ on the various parameters ρ (unperturbed number densities ratio ρ = ni0/ne0), μ (normalized ion to negative dust mass ratio μ = Znmi/mn), α (normalized ion to positive dust mass ratio α = Zpmi/mp), η (normalized charge number of positive dust η = Zpnp0/ne0) and ν (normalized charge number of negative dust ν = Znnn0/ne0) are investigated. Also, the geometric effect on the acoustic waves is considered. Figures 1 and 2 show the variation of the phase velocity λ against ν, η, α and μ. It is clear that λ is elevated with ν, α and μ but is reduced with η.

Fig. 1 The change of λ against ν for various values of η and for α = 0.002, and μ = 0.005.
Fig. 2 The change of λ against μ for various values of α and for ν = 1 and η = 1.5.

Figure 3 exhibits the variation of soliton amplitude ϕ0 with Lr and η. Clearly, this model supports both rarefactive and compressive solitons, depending on sign of nonlinear coefficient A, compressive type exists if A > 0 while rarefactive for A < 0. More specifically, plots of soliton amplitude ϕ0 and Δ (width) against η, U0, Lr, and ν are depicted in Figs. 48. The soliton amplitude ϕ0 of both compressive and rarefactive wave increases with Lr and η, as shown in Fig. 4. Accordingly, Lr and η lead to reduce the pulse amplitude ϕ0. Also, the soliton amplitude ϕ0 of compressive soliton decreases with ν but increases with Lr, μ, and η up to a certain value (Lr = 0.55), then ϕ0 begins to decrease with η. While the soliton amplitude ϕ0 of rarefactive soliton decreases with ν and μ and increases with Lr and η as depicted in Figs. 5 and 6.

Fig. 3 Variation of the amplitude ϕ0 against Lr and η for α = 0.002, μ = 0.005, and ν = 1.5.
Fig. 4 Change of amplitude ϕ0 against Lr and η for α = 0.002, μ = 0.005, and ν = 1.1.
Fig. 5 Change of amplitude ϕ0 against Lr and η for α = 0.002, μ = 0.005, ν = 1.1, and (a) U0 = 0.95; (b) U0 = 0.4.
Fig. 6 Change of the amplitude ϕ0 against μ for different values of ν and for α = 0.002, Lr = 0.5, η = 1.3, and (a) U0 = 0.95; (b) U0 = 0.4.
Fig. 7 Change of width Δ against Lr and ν for α = 0.002, μ = 0.005, η = 1.5, and U0 = 0.5.
Fig. 8 The change of the width Δ against U0 for different values of Lr and for α = 0.002, μ = 0.005, ν = 1.5, and η = 1.5.

On the other hand, Figs. 7 and 8 show the soliton width Δ dependence on ν, Lr and U0. It is seen that Δ increases with ν whereas it decreases with both Lr and U0. It is shown that ν makes the solitary profile much wider. According to soliton picture.[4445] Figures 911 display ϕ in Eq. (14) with Θ, R and Z, and T. It is noted that, soliton deviates towards the positively radial axis with increasing time and this cannot occur on neglecting Z and Θ coordinates. The DIA soliton is shown in Fig. 9 with R and Θ for two values of U0 = 0.3 and = 0.6. It is seen that how DIA amplitude varies with U0. The one dimensional model cannot explain such behavior.

Fig. 9 Three-dimensional solitary wave profile ϕ (14) against R and Θ at T = 0.5 and Z = 0.5 and for Lr = 0.9, α = 0.002, μ = 0.005, ν = 1.5, η = 1.5, and (a) U0 = 0.3; (b) U0 = 0.6.
Fig. 10 Three-dimensional solitary wave profile ϕ (14) against R and Θ at T = 0.5 and Z = 0.5 and for Lr = 0.9, α = 0.002, U0 = 0.5, μ = 0.005, ν = 1.5, and η = 1.5.
Fig. 11 Three-dimensional solitary wave profile ϕ (14) against R and Z at T = 0.5 and Θ = 0.2 and for Lr = 0.9, U0 = 0.2, α = 0.002, μ = 0.005, ν = 1.5, and η = 1.5.

Summing up, we have studied DIASWs propagation in plasma with isothermal electrons, mobile cold ions, positive and negative dust grains considered cylindrical geometry. The angular and radial dependence have been considered. Employing the (RP) technique, a 3D-CKP equation which describes the evolution of DIASWs has been derived and its localized solution has been obtained by reducing the 3D-CKP to the Korteweg-de Vries equation on employing a simple transformation of the coordinates. The effects of system parameters (ν, η, μ, Lr and U0) on phase velocity λ, soliton amplitude ϕ0, and width Δ have been examined numerically. We have shown graphically that these parameters play a vital role in the formation and the features of the DIA mesospheric solitary waves.[38,4647] These results agree with the mesospheric plasma information, see Refs. [4647]. Finally, our investigation of the solitary wave properties could be important in understanding nonlinearity features in space, as well as in laboratory and astrophysical environments in mesospheric plasma.

Reference
[1] Mendis D. A. Rosenberg M. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 32 1994 419
[2] Shukla P. K. Mamun A. A. Introduction to Dusty plasma Physics Institute of Physics Bristol 2002
[3] El-Labany S. K. Diab A. M. El-Shamy E. F. Astrophys. Space Sci. 282 2002 595
[4] Malik H. K Kumar R. Lonngren K. E. Nishida Y. Phys. Rev. E 92 2015 063107
[5] Carlile R. N. Geha S. O’Hanlon J. F. Stewart J. C. Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 1991 1167
[6] Barkan A. D’Angelo N. Merlino R. L. Planet. Space Sci. 44 1996 239
[7] Chu J. H. Du J. B. Lin I. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 1994b 4009
[8] Hayashi Y. Tachibana K. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2 1994 L804
[9] Thomas H. Morfill G. E. Dammel V. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 1994 652
[10] Rao N. N. Shukla P. K. Yu M. Y. Planet. Space Sci. 38 1990 543
[11] Shukla P. K. Slin V. P. Phys. Scr. 45 1992 508
[12] Melandso F. Phys. Plasmas 3 1996 3890
[13] Sahu B. Tribechem M. Astrophys. Space Sci. 338 2012 259
[14] El-Labany S. K. Moslem W. M. Safy F. M. Phys. Plasmas 13 2006 082903
[15] Malik R. Malik H. K. Kaushik S. C. Phys. Plasmas 19 2012 032107
[16] El-Hanbaly A. M. Sallah M. El-Shewy E. K. Darweesh H. F. J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 9 2015 167
[17] Nejoh Y. N. Phys. Plasmas 4 1997 2813
[18] Tang R. A. Xue J. K. Phys. Plasmas 9 2003 3800
[19] Moolla S. Bharuthram R. Baboolal S. Phys. Plasmas 12 2005 042310
[20] Gill T. S. Saini N. S. Kaur H. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 28 2006 1106
[21] Mamun A. A. J. Plasma Phys. 59 1997 575
[22] Mamun A. A. Astrophys. Space Sci. 268 1999 443
[23] Horanyi M. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 34 1996 383
[24] Nakamura Y. Odagiri T. Tsukabayashi I. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 39 1997 105
[25] Shukla P. K. Phys. Plasmas 1 1994 1362
[26] Mamun A. A. Shukla P. K. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29 2002 1518
[27] Mamun A. A. Phys. Rev. E 77 2008 026406
[28] Elwakil S. A. Zahran M. A. El-Shewy E. K. Mowafy A. E. Adv. Space Res. 48 2011 1067
[29] Xue J. K. Phys. Lett. A 314 2003 479
[30] Mamun A. A. Shukla P. K. Phys. Rev. E 80 2009 037401
[31] Moslem W. M. Abdelsalam U. M. Sabry R. et al. J. Plasma Phys. 76 2010 453
[32] Borhanian J. Shahmansouri M. Phys. Plasmas 20 2013 013707
[33] El-Bedwehy N. A. El-Attafi M. A. El-Labany S. K. Astrophys. Space Sci. 361 2016 299
[34] Taniuti T. Wei C. C. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 24 1968 941
[35] Liu K. Liu S. D. Atmospheric Dynamics Peking University Press Beijing 1999
[36] Moslem W. M. Sabry R. Shukla P. K. Phys. Plasmas 17 2010 032305
[37] Sabry R. Zahran M. A. Fan E. Phys. Lett. A 326 2004 93
[38] El-Labany S. K. El-Shewy E. K. El-Bedwehy N. A. et al. Indian J. Phys. 91 2017 337
[39] Barnes M. S. Keller J. H. Forster J. C. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 1992 313
[40] Zadorozhny A. M. Adv. Space Res. 28 2001 1095
[41] Horanyi M. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 34 1996 383
[42] Havnes O. Trøim J. Blix T. et al. J. Geophys. Res. 101 1996 1039
[43] Shukla P.K. Phys. Plasmas 11 2004 3676
[44] El-Labany S. K. Moslem W. M. El-Taibany W. F. Mahmoud M. Phys. Plasmas 11 2004 03303
[45] Dauxois T. Peyrard M. Physics of Solitons Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2005
[46] Mamun A. A. Phys. Rev. E 77 2008 026406
[47] El-Labany S. K. El-Shewy E. K. El-Razek H. N. A. El-Rahman A. A. Plasma Phys. Reports 43 2017 576